I don't think it would come as a surprise to most people who are more ethnically inclined than most, that a nation that uses civic nationalism as the ties that bind are not really bound at all, are they? In a server on discord, someone posted an article from a magazine called "The Root". It's a magazine by and for blacks in America. Revolving around the issues those employed by the magazine write about concerning the black experience and outlook in America.
The first piece I've seen from this magazine is titled "Patriotism Is for White People".
You can read the article for yourself, but a point I wanted to highlight was that even the most ardent black advocates realize the fact that America was not founded as a multicultural social experiment like the liberals and those of the tribe would have you believe. Here's a paragraph to demonstrate this:
"America’s inception was never designed to accommodate the liberty and
freedoms of its nonwhite people. When soldiers fought against Britain
during the Revolutionary War, it was a victory for white people. The
American flag was raised in victory in 1783 as its black citizens, who
were still not legally full human beings at the time, continued to
suffer in slavery some 80 years after the fact."
This shows that on some level, the blacks know what America is. At least the ones who think about it. It's also counter to the arguments of the globalist multicultural rootless cosmopolitan scum that have infested the cultural and moral fabric of the 20th and 21st centuries. It also exposes civic nationalism as the fallacy that it is.
Each people need their own separate lands. Co-existence is a meme of those very same cosmopolitans who have to create multicultural nations so they can move about unseen among the coloured hordes void of identity, purpose, and meaning. Pulling at the strings and directing an intellectually devolved race of people who only know how to consume and obey.
This, this is what we resist.
Wednesday, 27 September 2017
Our doctors leave, we import their doctors
Eight out of 10 trainee doctors are considering leaving Ireland because of poor working conditions, training opportunities and work-life balance, a survey has revealed.
The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) found almost one-fifth of the 523 doctors who responded to the survey had already emigrated between 2014 and 2016.
Twenty-two per cent of those
still in Ireland said they would definitely, or probably, leave, a
similar number were undecided and 18 per cent said they were definitely
staying.
Seventy-two per cent of doctors
who were undertaking or had recently completed postgraduate training in
Ireland believed they needed to spend time training abroad to compete
for consultant posts in Ireland.
However, more than 80 per cent also believed working conditions and training opportunities were better abroad.
RCSI
head of epidemiology and public health medicine Prof Ruairí Brugha, who
led the survey, said the chronic haemorrhage of doctors from Ireland
would continue as long as they were undervalued.
“Unless sufficient resources are
invested in providing specialist training for doctors after they have
graduated from medical school, employing them in adequately staffed
hospitals with comparable training and working conditions to what are on
offer in other countries, we will continue to lose those who are the
life blood of our health system,’’ he said.
Further replacement of our people. Who leave for greener pastures while those seeking greener pastures settle here, with sub standard education if they are at all qualified in the first place in many cases. This is unsustainable and is going to be one of the many contributors to Ireland's spiral back into being a third world nation.
Ireland will need 550,000 more homes and 660,000 more jobs for extra 1 million people by 2040
Ireland will need 550,000 more homes and 660,000 more jobs for extra 1 million people by 2040
From today until 3 November, the public can make written submissions on the government’s national planning framework.
The government has published a draft of its long-term strategic planning framework for future growth and prosperity, Ireland 2040 – Our Plan, and is calling for input from the public.
Of the one million extra people, 25% are planned for Dublin and another 25% across Cork, Limerick, Galway and Waterford.
According to the draft national planning framework this will enable all four cities to grow their population and jobs by 50-60%.
The remaining 50% of growth is to occur in towns, villages and rural areas.
Some of the objectives of the national planning framework are to:
- Enable people to live closer to where they work, moving away from the current unsustainable trends of increased commuting
- Regenerate rural Ireland by promoting environmentally sustainable growth patterns
- Plan for and implement a better distribution of regional growth, in terms of jobs and prosperity
- Transform settlements of all sizes through urban regeneration and bring life / jobs back into cities, towns and villages
From today until 3 November, the public can review the draft plan and make written submissions.
Minister for Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform Paschal Donohue said:
“The feedback from the public consultation phase will assist in finalising Ireland 2040 so that there is a robust, clear and realistic strategic planning framework for my Departments to progress the appropriate budgetary and investment follow-through, in particular through the 10-year National Investment Plan, which will be published together with the National Planning Framework.”
Where are all these extra 1 million people coming from, pray tell?
The 11 Point Plan of the Frankfurt School
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would: “• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls.
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces.
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’.
(((Munzenberg))) summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:
‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks’.”
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would: “• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls.
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces.
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’.
(((Munzenberg))) summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:
‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks’.”
Wednesday, 30 August 2017
Culture of Cowardice
We live in an age now, when it is more beneficial to be a coward and keep the head down, as opposed to peering over the parapet to take a look at the oncoming danger. It is a fact that has gripped most avenues of life today, from simple advertisers and business, all the way up to politics and the so called corridors of power.
It is utterly revolting. Is it any wonder that the youths interest in politics was at such a low level for such a prolonged period of time? There is no greatness anymore. No politician that is genuine in his goals will step forward and put his head above the parapet. Whenever they do, they immediately apologize afterwards and label the whole incident a terrible mistake on their part that should never have even been uttered. Thus, admitting that it was wrong to even think such a thought in the first place.
In the past, men boldly claimed their views and ran whole campaigns on such views, many to success. Achieved only by taking that initial and subsequent risks. To their livelihoods, to their relationships, familial and spousal. For many of the truest believers there was nothing more horrible to them as giving in to their opponents and cowing themselves in return for safety and stability. They pressed on, paying costs beyond what any today may have to endure and achieved their aims, one way or the other.
Maybe it's romanticism on my part, but I don't think so. People in the past were either made of sterner stuff, or we have simply been so domesticated that nothing other than safety and stability is our priority. I'm not going to sit here and pretend I am any better than anyone else either. I've never had to be tested on my views yet from outside the cyber space. Who knows, maybe I'd be one of the first to bow and buckle under the pressure of intense opposition. It's hard to know until you are actually faced with such a situation.
Another point people would bring up is "Why don't you stand up and lead? What is stopping anyone from standing and leading?" Well, in truth, nothing is. The old adage though of too many chiefs and not enough Indians is what I would point to in defense, maybe it's a poor defense when the movement or the cause of being pro-white or even just nationalist seems so beset by false leaders and charlatans that people are in desperate need of a genuine leader with pure intent. There is so many variables here though that it would take an essay to capture all the different nuances and issues that plague us today in that regard.
I just wanted to highlight this Culture of Cowardice, or put a name to something people have already known intuitively for so long, after someone showed me a message between a national party TD (member of parliament) of my nation in relation to Islam.
A picture paints a thousand words. It shows the ruling elites know, just as much as anyone else, the dangers of the changes that are occurring in Western Europe. They are simply too cowed to say or do anything about it, and so, we live in a Culture of Cowardice.
Unless our representatives in government start to take reality as it is and stop dressing it up for the easily offended, then maybe the end of our way of life as we know it is closer than we think?
It is utterly revolting. Is it any wonder that the youths interest in politics was at such a low level for such a prolonged period of time? There is no greatness anymore. No politician that is genuine in his goals will step forward and put his head above the parapet. Whenever they do, they immediately apologize afterwards and label the whole incident a terrible mistake on their part that should never have even been uttered. Thus, admitting that it was wrong to even think such a thought in the first place.
In the past, men boldly claimed their views and ran whole campaigns on such views, many to success. Achieved only by taking that initial and subsequent risks. To their livelihoods, to their relationships, familial and spousal. For many of the truest believers there was nothing more horrible to them as giving in to their opponents and cowing themselves in return for safety and stability. They pressed on, paying costs beyond what any today may have to endure and achieved their aims, one way or the other.
Maybe it's romanticism on my part, but I don't think so. People in the past were either made of sterner stuff, or we have simply been so domesticated that nothing other than safety and stability is our priority. I'm not going to sit here and pretend I am any better than anyone else either. I've never had to be tested on my views yet from outside the cyber space. Who knows, maybe I'd be one of the first to bow and buckle under the pressure of intense opposition. It's hard to know until you are actually faced with such a situation.
Another point people would bring up is "Why don't you stand up and lead? What is stopping anyone from standing and leading?" Well, in truth, nothing is. The old adage though of too many chiefs and not enough Indians is what I would point to in defense, maybe it's a poor defense when the movement or the cause of being pro-white or even just nationalist seems so beset by false leaders and charlatans that people are in desperate need of a genuine leader with pure intent. There is so many variables here though that it would take an essay to capture all the different nuances and issues that plague us today in that regard.
I just wanted to highlight this Culture of Cowardice, or put a name to something people have already known intuitively for so long, after someone showed me a message between a national party TD (member of parliament) of my nation in relation to Islam.
A picture paints a thousand words. It shows the ruling elites know, just as much as anyone else, the dangers of the changes that are occurring in Western Europe. They are simply too cowed to say or do anything about it, and so, we live in a Culture of Cowardice.
Unless our representatives in government start to take reality as it is and stop dressing it up for the easily offended, then maybe the end of our way of life as we know it is closer than we think?
Tuesday, 29 August 2017
Google Cracking down
Everyone is talking about the new moves google is taking to silence "controversial" content. It's stated aims are of course nebulous and appear to be for the removal of the Islamic terrorist content of Nasheeds and other videos of theirs from the platforms google operates. In practice, what is actually being removed is anything critical of political correctness, racial differences observable through science, such as IQ, and anything that attacks the globalist agenda at large. People are laying all the blame at googles feet, and of course they are responsible for the actual censorship. Just don't forget, someone is forcing this on Google just as much as it is a move made of their own accord. The EU forces Facebook and Google to tow the progressive and so called anti-racist line. Silencing any and all critical of the migrant aka invader crisis and progressive lunacy that has beset Europe. It's almost a cliche at this point to call it madness, but that is what it is. I've run out of verbs to describe it.
Googles monopoly in information technology is a product of the cherished "free market" the so-called skeptic community on YouTube likes to espouse as well as other internet personalities and individualists. There is no alternative to YouTube and Google that is as even remotely as attractive as said services. Google has a position of absolute power of the flow of information. The only way to check Googles power now, is through government intervention. However, given the governments of the current year, that's not exactly the rosey solution one might envision, as a lot of the governments globally, would be one hundred percent on board with Googles actions. Maybe not the united states with it's first amendment, but that even seems to be standing on shakey grounds these days.
No platforming is the route Google is taking. Ideologically, it is no secret they have more in common with Antifa than they do with anything even remotely right of centre. This is only the beginning. They have removed videos from the mainstream on YouTube, into a limited state, in which they remove all features from the video. You can no longer comment on nor rate said videos. Which others have raised, removes the opportunity to try and refute claims made in the video. As I stated earlier, they remove the videos critical of political correctness and racial differences etc. They will be replaced with the most degenerate videos you can even imagine. I watched a video recently, I think it was by computing forever, in that he showed the videos YouTube was producing and promoting and it's the stuff of nightmares. They expose children to sex toys, and sexual matter that you might not even want to expose yourself to, never mind a child before the age of ten.
There is a silver lining to this monopoly of censorship Google holds and that is the Streisand Effect. The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet. We're living in the digital age. Censorship, will not work. When something is removed and made taboo, it simply makes it a more attractive piece of knowledge to acquire.
Googles monopoly in information technology is a product of the cherished "free market" the so-called skeptic community on YouTube likes to espouse as well as other internet personalities and individualists. There is no alternative to YouTube and Google that is as even remotely as attractive as said services. Google has a position of absolute power of the flow of information. The only way to check Googles power now, is through government intervention. However, given the governments of the current year, that's not exactly the rosey solution one might envision, as a lot of the governments globally, would be one hundred percent on board with Googles actions. Maybe not the united states with it's first amendment, but that even seems to be standing on shakey grounds these days.
No platforming is the route Google is taking. Ideologically, it is no secret they have more in common with Antifa than they do with anything even remotely right of centre. This is only the beginning. They have removed videos from the mainstream on YouTube, into a limited state, in which they remove all features from the video. You can no longer comment on nor rate said videos. Which others have raised, removes the opportunity to try and refute claims made in the video. As I stated earlier, they remove the videos critical of political correctness and racial differences etc. They will be replaced with the most degenerate videos you can even imagine. I watched a video recently, I think it was by computing forever, in that he showed the videos YouTube was producing and promoting and it's the stuff of nightmares. They expose children to sex toys, and sexual matter that you might not even want to expose yourself to, never mind a child before the age of ten.
There is a silver lining to this monopoly of censorship Google holds and that is the Streisand Effect. The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet. We're living in the digital age. Censorship, will not work. When something is removed and made taboo, it simply makes it a more attractive piece of knowledge to acquire.
Tuesday, 6 September 2016
Fifth Columnists and Radical Liberals
Diversity is our strength, they say. Liberals, libertarians, Marxists, and fifth columnists. These people try desperately to oppose nature. Preferring to tell us that we are separate from it. That mankind has risen above the trappings and compulsions of nature. This is their agenda. To make us believe their worldview is the moral and just position to hold. The civilized answer to mankind's problems. We all know they are wrong, possibly even they themselves know it...
Nature cannot be ignored, and if it is, it will remind you. Harshly. Of your place and the rules in nature. We are as subject to nature as everything else on this planet. To think otherwise is hubris.
They tell you to "live for the moment". Don't think about. They say these things because they come from positions of weakness. Positions unnatural and subversive. All positions antithetical to the survival of civilization and race as well as nature.
There can be no denying the in-group mentality of foreign people. A mentality that Europeans once shared. Of course through years of rampant liberalism without concern for consequences, this has all but been eroded in the European man, in favour of tolerance and diversity. Multiculturalism is a weapon. A weapon that is being used against us. They can try to discredit it with names like conspiracy theory all they like, but anyone with a brain can see what is happening. Multiculturalism destroys diversity.
All the people who come to Europe from the Middle East in this migration crisis are not coming to contribute, they are coming to leech. If you've ever spoken to the people online who stay behind, they will tell you themselves, that it is the scum, criminals and terrorists who come to Europe. Looking for an easy life, a life that the Europeans will fund through taxes. A life that destroys Europe and Europeans. Europe is funding it's own destruction. While you work and pay your taxes, they take multiple wives and have countless children.
Nature is being ignored, and nature is punishing the arrogant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)