To my mind, nature is chaos. It doesn't plant in straight lines, life is
simply survival in the animal kingdom. Not being eaten. Constant
change. Chaos. Chaos is not inherently bad. Chaos is bad if you fear
chaos and how you perceive chaos. It's all about perspective. Chaos is a
regenerative force in my opinion, while civilization is degenerative.
Chaos is the only thing that keeps a being, an object, a collective, in
constant upward motion. Evolution.
I used to be a staunch National Socialist. Then I took a break from the
internet and found a lot of what I thought was important simply wasn't.
To me, civilization itself is the chaos (the thing I perceive as bad).
Nature is order. Nature is immutable, irrefutable, infinite and
invincible. Civilization is not. Civilization is bound to fail. It has
been shown to collapse numerous times around the globe throughout
history. It's delicate, it's vulnerable, it's finite. For the number of
people wanting to control it who share your worldview, there are an
equal number of those who share the opposite worldview. Endlessly
tugging and pulling in the direction they want it to go until cracks
appear along the seams which grow into fissures, which grow into deep,
dark holes, until it is torn asunder. Civilization is maybe thousands of
years old. Nature is billions of years old.... Billions.
Just because we are living at the most advanced time humans have lived
in does not exclude us from the reality of civilization being a finite
and vulnerable 'social construct'.
Wednesday 31 January 2018
Friday 19 January 2018
Channel 4's Jordan Peterson Hullabaloo
Channel 4, an English television station had an interview just days ago with a Canadian professor of Psychology, on their news program, who gained notoriety years ago from making what the politically correct crowd considered controversial videos on YouTube in the format of recording his lectures and debates he has had in public with people ideologically or at least topically opposed to him.
You can watch the video for yourself, but it was what one might expect from a left leaning, that is to say, mainstream, television station conducting an interview with someone they'd disagree with on issues of the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. The interviewer is Cathy Newman. She used the typical tactics of trying to put words in his mouth and cutting him off before fully elucidating his points. There is nothing new or groundbreaking in this video suggested by Peterson, especially to no one who is right of center, or at least intellectually honest enough to amend held beliefs based on factual evidence presented to them.
The station, and Newman in particular have copped a lot of heat for her debating tactics, as one might expect, though none of it shocking, it's par for the course with the media these days. Channel 4 has said that as a result of the sheer amount of abuse and threats she has received that they have had to call in security experts. Evidence of these threats and abuse remains to be seen, among the well reasoned critiques as well as the admittedly harsh retorts to the debate and how Newman conducted herself.
They claim that the debate resulted in a torrent of abuse and threats, yet when people, as well as myself, have checked on YouTube, there is little to no commenting that could be construed as threats or abuse, certainly there is harsh critiques, but nothing that should make someone fear for their safety. Of course, the messages could be sent to Newman privately, but without them showing evidence of such there can be no certainty.
Personally I think they are just doing what a mainstream television station is wont to do when one of their talking heads is resoundingly made to look a fool as a result of their own actions of trying to wrangle someone who is practiced and more intelligent, into positions they neither hold nor entertain through their own ideological lens of the world.
Is this an important story? Maybe not. It is trending though, and the consensus tends to be on the side of Peterson. Showing that at least people are jaded of the politically correct social justice causes endlessly paraded in peoples faces day in and day out on television and on other mediums.
You can watch the video for yourself, but it was what one might expect from a left leaning, that is to say, mainstream, television station conducting an interview with someone they'd disagree with on issues of the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. The interviewer is Cathy Newman. She used the typical tactics of trying to put words in his mouth and cutting him off before fully elucidating his points. There is nothing new or groundbreaking in this video suggested by Peterson, especially to no one who is right of center, or at least intellectually honest enough to amend held beliefs based on factual evidence presented to them.
The station, and Newman in particular have copped a lot of heat for her debating tactics, as one might expect, though none of it shocking, it's par for the course with the media these days. Channel 4 has said that as a result of the sheer amount of abuse and threats she has received that they have had to call in security experts. Evidence of these threats and abuse remains to be seen, among the well reasoned critiques as well as the admittedly harsh retorts to the debate and how Newman conducted herself.
They claim that the debate resulted in a torrent of abuse and threats, yet when people, as well as myself, have checked on YouTube, there is little to no commenting that could be construed as threats or abuse, certainly there is harsh critiques, but nothing that should make someone fear for their safety. Of course, the messages could be sent to Newman privately, but without them showing evidence of such there can be no certainty.
Personally I think they are just doing what a mainstream television station is wont to do when one of their talking heads is resoundingly made to look a fool as a result of their own actions of trying to wrangle someone who is practiced and more intelligent, into positions they neither hold nor entertain through their own ideological lens of the world.
Is this an important story? Maybe not. It is trending though, and the consensus tends to be on the side of Peterson. Showing that at least people are jaded of the politically correct social justice causes endlessly paraded in peoples faces day in and day out on television and on other mediums.
Monday 15 January 2018
Europes loss of introspection
I think, one of the biggest reasons Europe has gone so dooladdy, is that Europeans have seemingly completely lost the will to take serious long hard looks at their mental and emotional states. Europeans have become slaves to external stimuli and motivations rather than being introspective and calculating as in the past.
What I mean by this is that Europe, or at least the general citizenry (TPTB know exactly what it is that they are doing!), for the most part, does not examine their actions or really understand why it is they do the things that they do. I am of course referring to the things that would threaten European demographics. Pathological altruism to out groups and the holding open of borders to enable the dumping of human trash lesser nations are all too delighted to be rid of.
There are some Europeans who you'd swear if the sun shone a certain way, you could see the strings of the puppeteer glint if you watched closely enough. There seems to be absolutely no thinking brain or persona to speak of in a lot of them, and it's why I've more or less stopped being so invested in the outcome of what will happen in or to Europe. That's not to say that I want Europe or more specifically the European people destroyed. I just think a large portion of people, globally, have to die out. To allow natural selection to reassert itself. The laws of nature don't care about traditions or generations. Nature only cares about who is fittest for survival. When you have a lot of people threading the streets, oblivious to their surroundings, who are more akin to prey animals than predators, well then, the predators will circle. The fox will get into the coop, just as much for sport, as for food.
White nationalists insist that a person is worth the colour of their skin and worthy of protection. I say that's nonsense. A vast quantity of Europeans are as worthless as anyone else those White nationalists despise. No one is safe from the laws of nature, myself included, and without civilization there to keep everyone threading water, a lot of us would, and will, drown. It's for the best. Humanities numbers have become far too numerous and they are only increasing more and more, thanks in no small part again to "Western Civilization" and it's foreign aid for so called third world nations. Without that aid, their numbers would naturally regulate.
No one can predict the future but unless Europe and Europeans re-evaluate themselves and become introspective, then they will remain the plaything of the predators.
What I mean by this is that Europe, or at least the general citizenry (TPTB know exactly what it is that they are doing!), for the most part, does not examine their actions or really understand why it is they do the things that they do. I am of course referring to the things that would threaten European demographics. Pathological altruism to out groups and the holding open of borders to enable the dumping of human trash lesser nations are all too delighted to be rid of.
There are some Europeans who you'd swear if the sun shone a certain way, you could see the strings of the puppeteer glint if you watched closely enough. There seems to be absolutely no thinking brain or persona to speak of in a lot of them, and it's why I've more or less stopped being so invested in the outcome of what will happen in or to Europe. That's not to say that I want Europe or more specifically the European people destroyed. I just think a large portion of people, globally, have to die out. To allow natural selection to reassert itself. The laws of nature don't care about traditions or generations. Nature only cares about who is fittest for survival. When you have a lot of people threading the streets, oblivious to their surroundings, who are more akin to prey animals than predators, well then, the predators will circle. The fox will get into the coop, just as much for sport, as for food.
White nationalists insist that a person is worth the colour of their skin and worthy of protection. I say that's nonsense. A vast quantity of Europeans are as worthless as anyone else those White nationalists despise. No one is safe from the laws of nature, myself included, and without civilization there to keep everyone threading water, a lot of us would, and will, drown. It's for the best. Humanities numbers have become far too numerous and they are only increasing more and more, thanks in no small part again to "Western Civilization" and it's foreign aid for so called third world nations. Without that aid, their numbers would naturally regulate.
No one can predict the future but unless Europe and Europeans re-evaluate themselves and become introspective, then they will remain the plaything of the predators.
Monday 8 January 2018
Political Pointlessness
As I've mentioned previously, I've taken a prolonged break from politics and all associated activities online for going on a couple of months now, if not three.
When you take a break from the internet and political internet discussion in particular, you come to a few realizations. You come to the realization that just as much as anything else under the label of bread and circuses, politics is a means of control and deception. A method of keeping the people distracted. I mean, it's hardly anything new, I'm sure plenty of people think the same way.
It's especially apparent when you see internet comments of people debating political parties and the tactics and policies of those parties. It just strikes me as .... infantile? or facile? Without them meaning to be of course, and that might sound condescending as anything else you're likely to encounter. Yet, how many times has someone, somewhere else raised the same arguments and reasoning when debating political parties and their modus operandi? To me, from what I observed for the last few years of following politics especially identity politics closely, is that the battle, or rather, the war, has already been won.
The people on the opposition have already taken the institutions and the governments, and have created the policies. They've already let in vast multitudes of people to "diversify" and create their utopian multicultural nations, with no apparent end in sight to the stream of people to come. They like to talk about how the population of Africa is heading towards an explosion, insinuating that all those poor Africans will have no choice but to emigrate to Europe. There is so much wrong in that insinuation I won't bore you with a long diatribe on the matter.
I'm not against people trying the political route, but personally, I don't see it as a viable solution. Of course, the retort would be to question me on what solutions I offer. I offer none. I have none. Simply put I'm just a man online who sees that things are simply not as they should be. I see the entire system as a corrupt entity wielded by people who innately hate the people they are supposed to be governing for, and through that contempt, methodically and systematically working towards the destruction of the varied European people and identity, through a myriad of methods already discussed ad nauseum online.
When you take a break from the internet and political internet discussion in particular, you come to a few realizations. You come to the realization that just as much as anything else under the label of bread and circuses, politics is a means of control and deception. A method of keeping the people distracted. I mean, it's hardly anything new, I'm sure plenty of people think the same way.
It's especially apparent when you see internet comments of people debating political parties and the tactics and policies of those parties. It just strikes me as .... infantile? or facile? Without them meaning to be of course, and that might sound condescending as anything else you're likely to encounter. Yet, how many times has someone, somewhere else raised the same arguments and reasoning when debating political parties and their modus operandi? To me, from what I observed for the last few years of following politics especially identity politics closely, is that the battle, or rather, the war, has already been won.
The people on the opposition have already taken the institutions and the governments, and have created the policies. They've already let in vast multitudes of people to "diversify" and create their utopian multicultural nations, with no apparent end in sight to the stream of people to come. They like to talk about how the population of Africa is heading towards an explosion, insinuating that all those poor Africans will have no choice but to emigrate to Europe. There is so much wrong in that insinuation I won't bore you with a long diatribe on the matter.
I'm not against people trying the political route, but personally, I don't see it as a viable solution. Of course, the retort would be to question me on what solutions I offer. I offer none. I have none. Simply put I'm just a man online who sees that things are simply not as they should be. I see the entire system as a corrupt entity wielded by people who innately hate the people they are supposed to be governing for, and through that contempt, methodically and systematically working towards the destruction of the varied European people and identity, through a myriad of methods already discussed ad nauseum online.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)