Letter From Japan - A Japanese Reader Responds to O’Farrell’s Comments about Japan

http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/japanese.html

Sir,

Your column of 14 March ’05, “Tortured, Beaten, Burnt Alive“, opened with an oft-used device of White Nationalists contrasting the unmolested, racially healthy state of Japan with the unique hardships suffered by the White Western nations. While the situation isn’t as bleak, the grass isn’t completely green on the other side; and Japan, like every other nation, will have to fight for survival.

Jewish influence isn’t negligible. While Jews could not, as yet, subvert the nation from within, the pressure was always, and still is, being applied from outside mainly through international institutions and the United States; the seeds of destruction were sewn during the occupation after defeat in the War (a summary can be found here). Yes, the Holocaust hypnotism isn’t as intense because it is a European issue (though I hear the Anne Frank fraud is all the rage) but Japan has its own alleged atrocities that are wielded in much the same manner by Marxist intellectuals who yearn for the destruction of “reactionary” Japan. If you frequent IHR [the Institute of Historical Review], you may also know about the “Marco Polo” affair when a magazine was closed down under pressure from the Simon Wiesenthal Centre after publishing an article skeptical of the Holocaust.

For much of Japan’s history it could be held up as a model ethnic nation-state; I don’t think that is true any longer and the same rot afflicting the Western nations is surely spreading. Liberal one-hominid-one-vote democracies can’t be racially healthy. The country hosts a hostile Korean population loyal to Pyongyang, a steady stream of criminal Chinese illegals who, contrary to Western prejudices, are quite distinct from Japanese – having been subject to less mutual interbreeding than the European peoples – and, under the “labour shortages” scam, hundreds of thousands of “Japanese-Brazilians” – mostly incompatible mongrels – were imported en masse. Negroes have a foothold in many city centres where they peddle their popular culture to gullible, degenerate youths. Restrictions on foreigners are always being loosened, under pressure from activists (many being excitable Americans, including a sizable faction of Jews I’m sure, who can’t stand to think there might be a patch of God’s Earth that escapes the iron grip of “Freedom”) in typical ratchet-effect fashion. We may move slowly but we don’t have a reverse gear.

However small the problem now, it is bound to metastasize in a country afflicted with liberalism. Only international pariahs or countries too poor to be held to liberal “moral” standards could get away with repatriation; and without this immune system response, any positive rate of immigration is fatal and is likely to be characterised by acceleration through “positive feedback” as immigrants agitate for their family and pals to be let in as well – not to mention differential breeding and miscegenation.

I acknowledge that the situation in the West is far more dire and you’re perfectly entitled to greater alarm and, accordingly, it’s your prerogative to use whatever rhetorical devices you see fit for your target audience; I just wanted to say that it’s galling when I hear from so many that everything’s rosy in Japan when I see my country dying.

Ultimately, all nationalists are in the same boat. And we’re sinking.

Kind regards,

Japanese Patriot

Blood is all that matters

 A lot of people all over the internet are still debating politics and philosophy. They still see merit in ferreting out the value in such practices. I'm sure I needn't point out that the lines have already long been drawn in the sand. It's just that the waves seem to have washed over them and blurred those lines to the point where people can't see them as clearly and so other things appear much more boldly and prevalent. It's been seventy years since the war, yet you still have people talking about the JQ. While important, it's not going to be the stick that breaks the camels back. Nobody cares. The masses, don't care. Everyone's sphere of influence and experience is so small in regards to such large and seemingly abstract issues that they may as well not even exist. I can't do anything to affect change in that arena and I'd be so bold as to surmise that you can't either.

People work. People live. People have past times. None of which involves delving deep into tomes of the holiest of holies. Antisemitism. A lot of the nationalist right wing in Europe seems to have planted it's flag in the hill of antisemitism as the means by which to wake the masses. Nothing could be more futile unless designed. Maybe there's something to that...

Personally speaking I think we would be better served coming at this wide range of topics and issues that have beset Europe and it's amalgam of nations through the prism of culture, rather than of politics. It's easier to grow a strong tree in strong soil.

Politics is bread and circuses. I'll keep beating this drum until people start to hear it, or eventually I'll have to kick some heads in to allow some truth to seep in. In all seriousness though, I think people are starting to see it. The politicians are all bought. Every last one. The rulers are the banksters, and their corporate bum buddies. There is no toppling the people on the top of the system, unless you kick the system out from under them. It's their means of control. Civilization. Without it they have no control. That may seem reductionist, but it is the essential truth that I think everyone knows. The reason people keep fighting for "civilization" is because they are afraid of a drop in their comfort level.

It's just about asking ourselves what is truly important. Fighting ideologically, or fighting for the survival of our strain in the human stream of existence? A conscious reduction of our means to below the poverty level while striving for subsistence where and when possible. No object you own is important save for land to support you and yours. People. Family. Kin. Friends. Extended tribe. It's all that mattes. In the span of history, what was remembered? Was it palaces? Castles? Luxurious personal items?

It was people. Always and ever. History only remembers people. Who do we want writing that history?

The only thing that matters is blood, and in the end, victory will come down to blood. We're entering a dark ages 2.0. Only, this updated version will be far bloodier, as we won't be simply fighting genetic kin, but genetic aliens.

Celtic God's comment on Youtube

Do not despair. The strength of our ancestors runs through the veins of all our people. Pagans are on the rise again as strength is required in these times. I have said before and I will say again. I prophesize the current situation of our people will not end until blood runs like rivers. Our kindness though a strength is our weakness however that time will pass. At the moment our people resist the urge to strike at these invaders who have been invited into our homes by our weak and gullible leaders who through FEAR and greed allow the molestation of our people.

We as a people resist standing up or fighting back not through fear of the enemy but fear of ourselves. The stakes have become so steep that once we go to war as a people we will not be able to stop ourselves until the enemy is not only driven from our lands but the lands they once called home. Remember the Mongol invasion of the Middle East? Well my families oral history tells of the Northern tribes of men joining the Horsemen of the East and marching through the seas of sand and fire to exterminate these animals in the shape of men, pushing them back even beyond their own lands to be devoured by the men of night. The enemy was among us once before invited through deceit; for their wisdom but mainly their gold. We drove them out of our lands and beyond their own. Killing every living thing on the way, destroying their cities and their homes, we took nothing and to the dead we left their gold and furs and cloth.

This is why our people neglect action. It is not through weakness but fear. The histories may have been forgotten but we still remember. This fear is a fear of ourselves a fear that our brother the god of war will once again truly walk beside us and we will love him for it. We fear we will not only love him but relish his presence and not be able to stop until all wrongs perceived or real is eliminated from the world. That my friend would drown the world in blood. We remember though we may not know it and Ragnarok as the men of Odin call it is upon us once more. All is not lost and the world turns on us because they know our true strength and rightly fear it. The gods are returning and our people both fear and welcome their return. Take heart; our people are not weak; this time is but a time of rebirth and we are now in labor with the pains of that birthing. The language of our past may die but the heart shall continue.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Have you never wondered why if artisans and bardic abilities and farming and reverence of nature are so highly valued among Celtic, Germanic and our brothers the men of the Northern ice fields, why then were the warriors and the berserkers, blades of the gods, the breakers of men were so highly treasured? Did you think it was the ability of these men to cow and dominate their own people? No these people were an expression of the gods and in times of need were granted the abilities to preserve our people not superficial ideologies. This is why the Romans were allowed to test us. This is why Christianity was allowed to flourish. These things were done by our own people. In turn now that the gods are required this is why Christianity and the worship of a false god is dying, This is why the sons and daughters of true men and women are returning to the old faith, we can feel it.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Need proof? Tommy Robinson when giving the speech at speakers square in lieu of Sellner was attacked by 7 people and held his own. HE walked away. When that guy in NY defended his girl from 4 Muslims THEY went to the hospital severely beaten. In Australia a single man defending his wife on the beach beat several African Muslims nearly killing at least one. These displays of strength and courage were accomplished using nothing but bare hands and some of the enemies were armed giving them no advantage to the righteous savagery unleashed upon them by single members of our people. How many more of these stories have we not heard? Lets not forget the father who went to rescue his daughter and not only beat a house full of these animals but killed one and he used nothing but a knife. He was an old man. How long can the wall of ''civilization' hold back the tide of our peoples righteous indignation? The illusion is crumbling my friend and we once again will stand tall.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

May you walk with strength, retain the courage to speak and gain in wisdom of the heart of our people.                                               

The True Word

"Celsus was only one writer in a long tradition of Roman writers and philosophers who wrote and spoke out against Christianity, feeling that their doctrines were either inscrutable or downright foolish."

"Most Romans could not understand the Christians' insistence on their own superiority and their insistence upon their apparently exclusive path to salvation. They could also not understand Christianity’s claims that they were a unique religion with a long history reaching back to antiquity, when the Roman philosophers knew that Christianity had broken off from Judaism relatively recently and still used ancient Jewish texts both to formulate their theology and to support their religious claims."

 "Celsus’ first main point in his True Word was to refute the validity of Christianity. In his opinion Christian theology was based on an amalgamation of false eastern philosophical ideas hastily tied together. He stated that Christians would “weave together erroneous opinions drawn from ancient sources and trumpet them aloud”.[6] Celsus gave a point by point critique of Christian doctrine, and why it should not have been believed by anyone."

 "what now makes up the Christian Bible- Celsus found very insipid and unappealing compared to Greek and Roman legends of powerful and colorful gods. Celsus also found Christian philosophy lacking when compared to secular philosophy, and declared that “things are stated much better among the Greeks”.[7] Celsus used Plato as the representative for Greek philosophers and, according to him, when comparing the two philosophical traditions Christianity appeared far worse, as "Plato is not guilty of boasting and falsehood",[8] a crime which Celsus obviously feels is a trademark of Christian theologians. The only connection Celsus made between Greek philosophy and Christianity was when he asserted that “Jesus perverted the words of the philosopher”[9] (i.e. Plato)."

 "In his opinion, the main tenet of Christianity was “Do not ask questions, just believe” and “Thy faith will save thee".[13]"

 "Celsus complained that Christianity was a phenomenon limited primarily to the lower class. He claimed that Christians actively sought out and converted the ignorant, uneducated, and lower class, as they were the only people who would believe in such a ridiculous theology and blindly follow its doctrines.[14] If an individual was from the upper class, and therefore well educated and naturally of good character, they would not be converted because they could not possibly believe in the absurd assumptions one had to in order to be considered “Christian”."

"Celsus declared that Christians convert by “lead[ing] on wicked men by empty hopes, and to persuade them to despise better things, saying that if they refrain from them it will be better…”."

"Celsus’ main argument against Christianity, and why he attacked it with such vigor, was that he considered it a divisive and destructive force that would harm both the Roman Empire and society."

"Celsus listed many reasons for how his Roman readers could easily deduce that Christianity was endangering their unity and the stability of the Empire. Christianity originated from Judaism, whose adherents, although living within the Empire, had already revolted against Roman rule several times. The Christian community then became further divided amongst themselves, and Celsus complained that “matters are determined in different ways by the various sects”.[18] This dissension between different factions within Christianity proved to the Romans that Christians who could not even draw together under their own shared beliefs were naturally a divisive people and not only caused friction within their own philosophy but would disrupt the unity of the Empire. Finally Celsus and other Roman writers believed that “Christians are dangerous precisely because they put the advancement of their beliefs above the common good and the welfare of the state”"

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Word

Chaos is a regenerative force, Civilization is degenerative.

To my mind, nature is chaos. It doesn't plant in straight lines, life is simply survival in the animal kingdom. Not being eaten. Constant change. Chaos. Chaos is not inherently bad. Chaos is bad if you fear chaos and how you perceive chaos. It's all about perspective. Chaos is a regenerative force in my opinion, while civilization is degenerative. Chaos is the only thing that keeps a being, an object, a collective, in constant upward motion. Evolution.

I used to be a staunch National Socialist. Then I took a break from the internet and found a lot of what I thought was important simply wasn't. To me, civilization itself is the chaos (the thing I perceive as bad). Nature is order. Nature is immutable, irrefutable, infinite and invincible. Civilization is not. Civilization is bound to fail. It has been shown to collapse numerous times around the globe throughout history. It's delicate, it's vulnerable, it's finite. For the number of people wanting to control it who share your worldview, there are an equal number of those who share the opposite worldview. Endlessly tugging and pulling in the direction they want it to go until cracks appear along the seams which grow into fissures, which grow into deep, dark holes, until it is torn asunder. Civilization is maybe thousands of years old. Nature is billions of years old.... Billions.

 Just because we are living at the most advanced time humans have lived in does not exclude us from the reality of civilization being a finite and vulnerable 'social construct'.

Channel 4's Jordan Peterson Hullabaloo

Channel 4, an English television station had an interview just days ago with a Canadian professor of Psychology, on their news program, who gained notoriety years ago from making what the politically correct crowd considered controversial videos on YouTube in the format of recording his lectures and debates he has had in public with people ideologically or at least topically opposed to him.

You can watch the video for yourself, but it was what one might expect from a left leaning, that is to say, mainstream, television station conducting an interview with someone they'd disagree with on issues of the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. The interviewer is Cathy Newman. She used the typical tactics of trying to put words in his mouth and cutting him off before fully elucidating his points. There is nothing new or groundbreaking in this video suggested by Peterson, especially to no one who is right of center, or at least intellectually honest enough to amend held beliefs based on factual evidence presented to them.

The station, and Newman in particular have copped a lot of heat for her debating tactics, as one might expect, though none of it shocking, it's par for the course with the media these days. Channel 4 has said that as a result of the sheer amount of abuse and threats she has received that they have had to call in security experts. Evidence of these threats and abuse remains to be seen, among the well reasoned critiques as well as the admittedly harsh retorts to the debate and how Newman conducted herself.

They claim that the debate resulted in a torrent of abuse and threats, yet when people, as well as myself, have checked on YouTube, there is little to no commenting that could be construed as threats or abuse, certainly there is harsh critiques, but nothing that should make someone fear for their safety. Of course, the messages could be sent to Newman privately, but without them showing evidence of such there can be no certainty.

Personally I think they are just doing what a mainstream television station is wont to do when one of their talking heads is resoundingly made to look a fool as a result of their own actions of trying to wrangle someone who is practiced and more intelligent, into positions they neither hold nor entertain through their own ideological lens of the world.

Is this an important story? Maybe not. It is trending though, and the consensus tends to be on the side of Peterson. Showing that at least people are jaded of the politically correct social justice causes endlessly paraded in peoples faces day in and day out on television and on other mediums.

Europes loss of introspection

I think, one of the biggest reasons Europe has gone so dooladdy, is that Europeans have seemingly completely lost the will to take serious long hard looks at their mental and emotional states. Europeans have become slaves to external stimuli and motivations rather than being introspective and calculating as in the past.
What I mean by this is that Europe, or at least the general citizenry (TPTB know exactly what it is that they are doing!), for the most part, does not examine their actions or really understand why it is they do the things that they do. I am of course referring to the things that would threaten European demographics. Pathological altruism to out groups and the holding open of borders to enable the dumping of human trash lesser nations are all too delighted to be rid of.

There are some Europeans who you'd swear if the sun shone a certain way, you could see the strings of the puppeteer glint if you watched closely enough. There seems to be absolutely no thinking brain or persona to speak of in a lot of them, and it's why I've more or less stopped being so invested in the outcome of what will happen in or to Europe. That's not to say that I want Europe or more specifically the European people destroyed. I just think a large portion of people, globally, have to die out. To allow natural selection to reassert itself. The laws of nature don't care about traditions or generations. Nature only cares about who is fittest for survival. When you have a lot of people threading the streets, oblivious to their surroundings, who are more akin to prey animals than predators, well then, the predators will circle. The fox will get into the coop, just as much for sport, as for food.

White nationalists insist that a person is worth the colour of their skin and worthy of protection. I say that's nonsense. A vast quantity of Europeans are as worthless as anyone else those White nationalists despise. No one is safe from the laws of nature, myself included, and without civilization there to keep everyone threading water, a lot of us would, and will, drown. It's for the best. Humanities numbers have become far too numerous and they are only increasing more and more, thanks in no small part again to "Western Civilization" and it's foreign aid for so called third world nations. Without that aid, their numbers would naturally regulate.

No one can predict the future but unless Europe and Europeans re-evaluate themselves and become introspective, then they will remain the plaything of the predators.

Political Pointlessness

As I've mentioned previously, I've taken a prolonged break from politics and all associated activities online for going on a couple of months now, if not three.

When you take a break from the internet and political internet discussion in particular, you come to a few realizations. You come to the realization that just as much as anything else under the label of bread and circuses, politics is a means of control and deception. A method of keeping the people distracted. I mean, it's hardly anything new, I'm sure plenty of people think the same way.

It's especially apparent when you see internet comments of people debating political parties and the tactics and policies of those parties. It just strikes me as .... infantile? or facile? Without them meaning to be of course, and that might sound condescending as anything else you're likely to encounter. Yet, how many times has someone, somewhere else raised the same arguments and reasoning when debating political parties and their modus operandi? To me, from what I observed for the last few years of following politics especially identity politics closely, is that the battle, or rather, the war, has already been won. 
The people on the opposition have already taken the institutions and the governments, and have created the policies. They've already let in vast multitudes of people to "diversify" and create their utopian multicultural nations, with no apparent end in sight to the stream of people to come. They like to talk about how the population of Africa is heading towards an explosion, insinuating that all those poor Africans will have no choice but to emigrate to Europe. There is so much wrong in that insinuation I won't bore you with a long diatribe on the matter.

I'm not against people trying the political route, but personally, I don't see it as a viable solution. Of course, the retort would be to question me on what solutions I offer. I offer none. I have none. Simply put I'm just a man online who sees that things are simply not as they should be. I see the entire system as a corrupt entity wielded by people who innately hate the people they are supposed to be governing for, and through that contempt, methodically and systematically working towards the destruction of the varied European people and identity, through a myriad of methods already discussed ad nauseum online.