This isn't an attack on this particular person, just the question. The question of whether whites should have their own nations is one I find quite repulsive. To me, it's a question that seems to suggest that there is validity to the claims that white people, or better phrased, European people, are a non entity. A people with no ties that bind them together, much as the leftists and globalist progressive types make out.
It's arguing a point from a position of weakness. The assumption should always remain that European nations are our nations, because they are. When these nations were founded, they were not asking themselves how they can help the rest of the planet integrate into English, German, Spanish, Italian society.... they were bringing about the manifestation of the greater family of which their immediate family comprises. They were setting the boundaries of the territorial ownership of their kin, bordering the next ethnic group and remaining separate entities. If you're reading this blog and know my general outlook, I can stop here. I don't think I need to explain the concept of nation, to you. A simple dictionary definition of the word nation will refute globalist no-border advocates.
It really pisses me off, if you couldn't tell. So to stop all these inane fucking questions. YES, whites should could and DO have our own nations. The problem is that they are being invaded. The claims of ownership were never in question. Ireland is Irish. England is English. Scotland is Scottish.
Need I continue?