I've taken a prolonged break of about a month from everything political
online. It changed my perspective on things. I could feel a change of my
views coming on even before I decided to take the break. The break
turned into a complete abandonment of views I thought were necessary.
I've
been a subscriber of Vargs (ThuleanPerspective) on YouTube for years
now and taking that break has shown me what is truly important or better
put, what isn't important.
It's not nations. It's not ideologies. It's not even the great mass of "whites" or more appropriately, Europeans that matter.
A
mindset has infected the European people for centuries now, that is
possibly not even of our own doing initially, but has been propagated
willingly into further generations. The "enlightenment" ideals.
Civilization itself is a part of this dysgenic effect that only serves
to further degrade the quality of Europeans.
Most people on the
right are fighting for he continuation of this malady named
civilization. When what the world needs, and not just Europe, is a total
collapse of civilization. It might sound 'larpy' or unhinged or
something, but the simple fact is that the comfort afforded to the
masses, if left intact, will only work towards bringing that same
degeneracy and degradation back into effect as it has time and again
throughout history.
Not to mention that the people in control of
the system are in control of at least 50% of the worlds wealth. It's
irrational to expect political change at this point. If I control that
much, why would I allow slave upstarts to 'vote' me out of power?
There can be no creation without destruction.
Saturday, 23 December 2017
Friday, 15 December 2017
Ancient Europeans were rapists?
"Varg, I would like to hear your theory on why rape is such a broad
stereotype for our ancestors. Is this an attempt by invaders to strip
the natives of their honor by demonizing them with the reputation for
raping?"
"Yes. There was e. g. not one single contemporary source claiming the Vikings raped anybody. This is something Christians made up 100+ years later."
"Ibn Fadlan has several accounts of rape by the Volga vikings in the journal of his travels."
"Ibn Fadlan talks about "Vikings" who are as tall as trees ... it's nonsense from A to Z."
"Several rapes took place in monasteries, including of children. You have to remember these people were responsible for registering births and burying the dead. It's a well known fact that monks butt-raped each other, and did other sorts of abuses and sacrifices... Monasteries had to be fortified, or else the people there would end like several 6th century frankish "saints", who were "martyred" by local "bandits"..."
"+ThuleanPerspective ... you mean they didn't spit in cups and communally washed their faces in bowls of eachothers drool either? Or that they didn't have tattoos from head to toe, or that they didn't gangbang slave women before slitting their throats and sacrificing them in honor of their chieftain? Who would have thought Ibn Fadlan could be so disingenuous, given how honest and upstanding the muslims usually are, what with Taqiyya and all..."
"+Danneskjold Ha ha. And notice how reliable that Muslim Arab suddenly becomes in the eyes of Christians, because he talks nonsense about Pagans... anything else coming from his mouth though... they will not trust!"
"+ThuleanPerspective Well, given how much cognitive dissonance they can have in regards to their 'own' religion, why not extend that to everything else! I don't even understand why the christians and muslims aren't allies yet anyway, since they are almost identical in their moral-nihilism, and their desire to watch the world burn."
"Yes. There was e. g. not one single contemporary source claiming the Vikings raped anybody. This is something Christians made up 100+ years later."
"Ibn Fadlan has several accounts of rape by the Volga vikings in the journal of his travels."
"Ibn Fadlan talks about "Vikings" who are as tall as trees ... it's nonsense from A to Z."
"Several rapes took place in monasteries, including of children. You have to remember these people were responsible for registering births and burying the dead. It's a well known fact that monks butt-raped each other, and did other sorts of abuses and sacrifices... Monasteries had to be fortified, or else the people there would end like several 6th century frankish "saints", who were "martyred" by local "bandits"..."
"+ThuleanPerspective ... you mean they didn't spit in cups and communally washed their faces in bowls of eachothers drool either? Or that they didn't have tattoos from head to toe, or that they didn't gangbang slave women before slitting their throats and sacrificing them in honor of their chieftain? Who would have thought Ibn Fadlan could be so disingenuous, given how honest and upstanding the muslims usually are, what with Taqiyya and all..."
"+Danneskjold Ha ha. And notice how reliable that Muslim Arab suddenly becomes in the eyes of Christians, because he talks nonsense about Pagans... anything else coming from his mouth though... they will not trust!"
"+ThuleanPerspective Well, given how much cognitive dissonance they can have in regards to their 'own' religion, why not extend that to everything else! I don't even understand why the christians and muslims aren't allies yet anyway, since they are almost identical in their moral-nihilism, and their desire to watch the world burn."
Barbarism is cleanliness, Civilization is filthy degeneracy (Collection of Comments on YT thread.)
"For all that, the marriage bond is strict, and
no feature in their mode of life is more creditable to them
than this. Unlike the great majority of barbarians, they
are content with one wife : very few of them have more
than one, and these few exceptions are not due to wan-
tonness ; they are cases of men of high rank, to whom
several matrimonial alliances have been offered from
motives of policy. The wife does not bring a dowry to
her husband ; on the contrary, he offers one to her. This
part of the affair is arranged by her parents and kinsmen,
and they pass judgment on the wedding gifts, which are
no toys collected to suit feminine frivolities or adorn a
bride ; instead of that, they consist of oxen, and a
bridled horse, and shield and spear and sword. These
are the presents that await her as a wife, and her own
wedding present to her husband in return is a gift of
arms. This is the strongest bond of union this the
mystery of marriage ; these are their gods of wedded life.
[...]
So they guard the chastity of their lives, with no shows to entice them nor orgies to excite their evil passions. To men and women alike such a thing as secret correspondence is unknown. Amongst all this immense population adultery is extremely rare : its penalty is instant, and is left to the husband ; he cuts off the hair of the unfaithful wife, strips her, turns her out of his house in the presence of the kinsmen, and scourges her through the whole village. For there is no pardon for the fallen woman ; not by her beauty, not by her youth, not by her wealth, will she succeed in finding a husband. For no one there makes a jest of vice, or says that seducing and being seduced is the style of the period.
Better still, to be sure, is the practice of those states in which none but maidens marry, and a woman becomes a wife with a wife's hopes and wishes once and once only. Thus it becomes as much a matter of course for her to have only one husband as to have only one body or one life, to the end that she may not look beyond him nor let her desires stray further, and that she may not so much cherish her husband as her status as a wife. To limit the number of the family or to put to death any of the later-born infants is held to be an abomination, and with the Germans good customs have more authority than good laws elsewhere. "
- Publius Cornelius Tacitus; Germania
Written in the 1st century AND by their official enemy, which makes it all the more credible. But Tacitus' was an honorable man, he sought to rebuke his own people and predicted their inevitable downfall as a consequence of their increasing degeneracy. The early Roman Republic adhered to the same moral virtues as the Germanic tribes of Tacitus time, which was the main reason for their unsurpassed success. (that, and racial homogeneity, but that goes hand in hand with virtue anyway)
And he was right, the Germanics ended up conquering all of Western Europe, after the Romans put the final nail in their own coffin by their de jure adoption of christianity. Then the Germanic kingdoms split and in-fought after they did the same.
The so-called Viking age was nothing but a united Scandinavian effort against this foreign usurpative religion. Lindisfarne happened only a few years after the massacre at Verden (which you recently mentioned in a vid), after the surviving Saxons fled to Denmark and warned them of what was imminently impending. It is hardly a coincidence that that was the time when repeated, organized attacks on centers of christianity began (even if the post-modern "historians" say it was for the usual trivial reasons of 'easy target & profit'")
And why was England the main target of invasion by the 'vikings'? Because they were a brotherfolk, who had fought a similar huge civil war AGAINST christianity barely even a century prior ( check King Penda of Mercia, a true hero from our æt). In other words, it was a liberation-invasion.
'Danedrotten
Dåd vi skylde,
hver, som god
og gjæv vil nævnes.
Ve den fejge
Nidding, som flyr!
når Kongen trænger
til trofast Følge!'
Lindisfarne also happened, because that was the missionary center (HQ) from where they sent missionaries to Norway. So "big surprise", the Vikings who sacked that shit hold came from?..... yeah: Norway.
What is also often forgotten, in relation to your comment about the Massacre at Verden, by the Franks , is that the vast majority of Viking attacks took place against France . If I recall correctly, as much as 90% of the raids!
However, this happened only after the Scandinavians had spent some time cleaning up back home in Scandinavia. Because until then (Verden), they had been tolerant to the Christians, and there were many monasteries and churches in Scandinavia already -- with British (Celtic and Anglo-Saxon) monks and priests. They sakced them and burnt those first and then went to stop more from coming -- from e. g. Lindisfarne.
Indeed, which would make sense, since the Franks were the primary military enemy. Strategically I think they focused their invasion on England for these reasons:
1: The forced conversion of the English was still recent, and had far from settled in the hearts and minds of our brothers, so ousting the authority would have ensured a quick reversion to their authentic loyalties.
2: To use England as a launching pad for war against France. If England had been under our control, the Franks could never have invaded Denmark as they did, since they would have been split on two fronts. The Norsemen could never have stood a chance against the combined armies of the Franks in open-field battle, but we could have stalled them indefinitely or perhaps even drained them and achieved final victory, if we had controlled England.
Also, the beginning of the Viking age is such an arbitrary date anyway. Several of our Kings, most prominently King Hugleik, began raiding France immediately after they'd adopted christianity around 500AD. Clovis converted around 507 I believe, which is also approx the exact time that Dannevirke was first built.
[...]
So they guard the chastity of their lives, with no shows to entice them nor orgies to excite their evil passions. To men and women alike such a thing as secret correspondence is unknown. Amongst all this immense population adultery is extremely rare : its penalty is instant, and is left to the husband ; he cuts off the hair of the unfaithful wife, strips her, turns her out of his house in the presence of the kinsmen, and scourges her through the whole village. For there is no pardon for the fallen woman ; not by her beauty, not by her youth, not by her wealth, will she succeed in finding a husband. For no one there makes a jest of vice, or says that seducing and being seduced is the style of the period.
Better still, to be sure, is the practice of those states in which none but maidens marry, and a woman becomes a wife with a wife's hopes and wishes once and once only. Thus it becomes as much a matter of course for her to have only one husband as to have only one body or one life, to the end that she may not look beyond him nor let her desires stray further, and that she may not so much cherish her husband as her status as a wife. To limit the number of the family or to put to death any of the later-born infants is held to be an abomination, and with the Germans good customs have more authority than good laws elsewhere. "
- Publius Cornelius Tacitus; Germania
Written in the 1st century AND by their official enemy, which makes it all the more credible. But Tacitus' was an honorable man, he sought to rebuke his own people and predicted their inevitable downfall as a consequence of their increasing degeneracy. The early Roman Republic adhered to the same moral virtues as the Germanic tribes of Tacitus time, which was the main reason for their unsurpassed success. (that, and racial homogeneity, but that goes hand in hand with virtue anyway)
And he was right, the Germanics ended up conquering all of Western Europe, after the Romans put the final nail in their own coffin by their de jure adoption of christianity. Then the Germanic kingdoms split and in-fought after they did the same.
The so-called Viking age was nothing but a united Scandinavian effort against this foreign usurpative religion. Lindisfarne happened only a few years after the massacre at Verden (which you recently mentioned in a vid), after the surviving Saxons fled to Denmark and warned them of what was imminently impending. It is hardly a coincidence that that was the time when repeated, organized attacks on centers of christianity began (even if the post-modern "historians" say it was for the usual trivial reasons of 'easy target & profit'")
And why was England the main target of invasion by the 'vikings'? Because they were a brotherfolk, who had fought a similar huge civil war AGAINST christianity barely even a century prior ( check King Penda of Mercia, a true hero from our æt). In other words, it was a liberation-invasion.
'Danedrotten
Dåd vi skylde,
hver, som god
og gjæv vil nævnes.
Ve den fejge
Nidding, som flyr!
når Kongen trænger
til trofast Følge!'
Lindisfarne also happened, because that was the missionary center (HQ) from where they sent missionaries to Norway. So "big surprise", the Vikings who sacked that shit hold came from?..... yeah: Norway.
What is also often forgotten, in relation to your comment about the Massacre at Verden, by the Franks , is that the vast majority of Viking attacks took place against France . If I recall correctly, as much as 90% of the raids!
However, this happened only after the Scandinavians had spent some time cleaning up back home in Scandinavia. Because until then (Verden), they had been tolerant to the Christians, and there were many monasteries and churches in Scandinavia already -- with British (Celtic and Anglo-Saxon) monks and priests. They sakced them and burnt those first and then went to stop more from coming -- from e. g. Lindisfarne.
Indeed, which would make sense, since the Franks were the primary military enemy. Strategically I think they focused their invasion on England for these reasons:
1: The forced conversion of the English was still recent, and had far from settled in the hearts and minds of our brothers, so ousting the authority would have ensured a quick reversion to their authentic loyalties.
2: To use England as a launching pad for war against France. If England had been under our control, the Franks could never have invaded Denmark as they did, since they would have been split on two fronts. The Norsemen could never have stood a chance against the combined armies of the Franks in open-field battle, but we could have stalled them indefinitely or perhaps even drained them and achieved final victory, if we had controlled England.
Also, the beginning of the Viking age is such an arbitrary date anyway. Several of our Kings, most prominently King Hugleik, began raiding France immediately after they'd adopted christianity around 500AD. Clovis converted around 507 I believe, which is also approx the exact time that Dannevirke was first built.
Wednesday, 13 December 2017
Be wary of Political Parties
"Some of my friends joined a newly founded civic nationalist party last
year here in Denmark, (a vehemently anti-islam one) in the hopes of
finding like-minded people to resist the replacement. After they brought
up the topic of zionist infiltration of our state-sponsored media etc
here, at a low-key party closed gathering, they were purged from the
party immediately. (The top CEO of Danmarks Radio, the main news outlet
in the country, is the former President of Danish Zionist Association)
A few days later their full names and info were leaked on various antifa and commie sites, with the mandatory face-pic, lies and slander.
This info had been given to the commies by a guy who had been at the table, who we later discovered was a (((merchant))). As far as we know it was only 1 guy, but even that was enough.
That was approx 6 month ago. Now the aforementioned party is doing TV ads about how we should support Israel 100% and how the (((merchants))) here are the biggest victims of the 3rd world invasion.
I want you all to be aware of this before you consider joining a similar political party out of desperation."
A few days later their full names and info were leaked on various antifa and commie sites, with the mandatory face-pic, lies and slander.
This info had been given to the commies by a guy who had been at the table, who we later discovered was a (((merchant))). As far as we know it was only 1 guy, but even that was enough.
That was approx 6 month ago. Now the aforementioned party is doing TV ads about how we should support Israel 100% and how the (((merchants))) here are the biggest victims of the 3rd world invasion.
I want you all to be aware of this before you consider joining a similar political party out of desperation."
Saturday, 9 December 2017
Quality over Quantity
"You know what, I know dudes who can't stop whining about constantly
seeing mixed-race couples in Copenhagen (females being the white one of
course), YET at the same time they constantly express a desire to "save"
them, "red pill" them, etc.
To them, it seems, every traitor or parasite is someone we should sacrifice ourselves for, simply because they are white. It hardly matters how many half-breeds these whites have spat out, or whether they have served the interests of the extreme left for years, or whatever the case may be - "whatever, they are white, they must be saved"... ??? Surely a camouflage for their own inconsistency and weakness. Like a loop of masochism and self-flagellation.
They will keep the focus on saving the "poor, brainwashed DEGENERATES", instead of saving the virtuous and the loyal. Why? Probably to give themselves an excuse never to actually do anything, and instead wallow in their own misery. "Let's put up some anti-commie stickers and feel good about ourselves for a year" mentality.
Let the parasites die out! Rejoice when they kill themselves off genetically. Smile when you consider the fact that your own descendants won't have to live alongside their pathetic and callous offspring. One should almost appreciate it when seeing traitors and pro-multi-kulti cucks around, because at least we can then see who is on whose side, and when the time comes, we can finally, after many centuries, separate from those as well.
Brothers, do not jump into freezing water to save a fool who prefers to drown.
PS: "We have NOT inherited Thule from our Ancestors - We have borrowed it from our CHILDREN.""
To them, it seems, every traitor or parasite is someone we should sacrifice ourselves for, simply because they are white. It hardly matters how many half-breeds these whites have spat out, or whether they have served the interests of the extreme left for years, or whatever the case may be - "whatever, they are white, they must be saved"... ??? Surely a camouflage for their own inconsistency and weakness. Like a loop of masochism and self-flagellation.
They will keep the focus on saving the "poor, brainwashed DEGENERATES", instead of saving the virtuous and the loyal. Why? Probably to give themselves an excuse never to actually do anything, and instead wallow in their own misery. "Let's put up some anti-commie stickers and feel good about ourselves for a year" mentality.
Let the parasites die out! Rejoice when they kill themselves off genetically. Smile when you consider the fact that your own descendants won't have to live alongside their pathetic and callous offspring. One should almost appreciate it when seeing traitors and pro-multi-kulti cucks around, because at least we can then see who is on whose side, and when the time comes, we can finally, after many centuries, separate from those as well.
Brothers, do not jump into freezing water to save a fool who prefers to drown.
PS: "We have NOT inherited Thule from our Ancestors - We have borrowed it from our CHILDREN.""
Tuesday, 28 November 2017
A comment from YouTube that encapsulates Antifa
"On paper Antifa sounds fine. I mean, who doesn’t hate nazis and want to
fight for the oppressed victims of the system!? I bought into it during
my university years. It’s a romantic, seductive idea. Emboldened by
babby’s first read of das kapital, with a communist flag hanging in the
dorm room, listening to che guevara speeches, calling each other
comrade.
The irony is, is that Antifa are privileged middleclass youth who have
bought into the mass hysteria of the MSM, while regurgitating marxist
propaganda they’re forcefed at college. There’s nothing unique,
couragous or groundbreaking in this at all. It’s tribal radicalisation
completely intolerant and hostile to other views. Hypocrites who
advocate for the censorship and violence towards these enemies/nazis
(which actually means everyone rightwing.)
There’s nothing progressive or positive here. There are a multitude of
better and practical ways these people could do to make meaningful
change (if they truely cared about people). But it's fun to dress up
with your tribe, destroy stuff and be violent. It’s a facade of virtue
and justice drenched in the romantic ideals of the revolutionary
marxist. The edgy, ‘fringe’ radical who ‘get’s it’, and will stand up to
the evils of the white capitalist, while enjoying all the fruits of
western civilisation, tradition, and wealth that capitalism created."
Sunday, 12 November 2017
Ideological Dogmatism Serves Only The Powers That Be
Left vs right... it's all shite. Who ever wins is simply going to prop
up the system that is killing us for a pointless few more years of
further abject misery. Let the system die. Live as simple a life as
possible. Material goods will not fulfill you.
Nationalism Vs Communism/globalism. Abrahamic religion vs Abrahamic religion... pointless... The inevitability of the obsolescence of the nation state is drawing nearer alongside the obsolescence of economics through total societal collapse. More local, less national.
Ideological thought is dogmatic and restrictive to true and philosophical thought that can actually further humanity or a people. It's time to move past the 19th and 20th century lines of thinking. Humanity hasn't truly moved since the war. Some social changes yes, yet pointless.
Nationalism Vs Communism/globalism. Abrahamic religion vs Abrahamic religion... pointless... The inevitability of the obsolescence of the nation state is drawing nearer alongside the obsolescence of economics through total societal collapse. More local, less national.
Ideological thought is dogmatic and restrictive to true and philosophical thought that can actually further humanity or a people. It's time to move past the 19th and 20th century lines of thinking. Humanity hasn't truly moved since the war. Some social changes yes, yet pointless.
'Altright' solutions
"NEIN! We must protect those very untermenschen among "our own" who have
been parasites for centuries and brought us in this situation in the
first place!
We must sacrifice our rational minds in favor of herdlike zeal without expectations or demands from the individuals in our group!
We must grow overcompensating biceps and pectoralis muscles that make us slow, useless in a fight and are needlessly calorie consuming, because Glorious-MaKedon-aesthetics > Utility.
We must have fasci haircuts, because Paul commands us goyim males to have short hair in the New Testament (to show our slave status to yahweh)
The way to victory is the alt-right, and let me detail the steps.
1: Talk about racial purity alot but always applaud our half-breed-3rd-world, "high IQ" (lol) alt-right "leaders" like McCarthy etc.
2: Go to alot of demos so the system will be able to have all details about you in their database and so that Redox and antifa type doxing sites can slander and expose you.
3: Laugh condescendingly at preppers or people who take concrete action to be prepared in the (inevitable) event of societal breakdown - instead, suggest to others that they should become active in local democratic politics, and accuse people with food stocks, ammo crates and weapons of being "larpers" (follow Mark Collett, the (((suspiciously big-nosed))), black-eyed ARCH-EUROPEAN! for more advice on this)
4: Snicker when someone says nigger, and relish that feeling of superiority at your massive red-pill wisdom and having done your duty for the day.
5: NEVER swear loyalty to a folk, tribe or family or your own honor. Instead, swear loyalty to abstract ideologies or memes (muh national socialism etc), so you can be like your fellow alt-righters, who rarely know the simplest basics of the history or traditions of their forefathers, but who apparently really care about preserving things they don't bother to investigate in the slightest.
6: Remember to be cool and edgy and lift weights on camera regularly. You must prove that you are stronger than a 14 year old and that you are gloriously competent enough to be able to bend your elbow while holding a metal object in your hand. REMEMBER to compare this to the feats of various viking or spartan kings, so that everyone can see you are the equal of such men.
Finally, make a youtube account with a happy merchant pic and say stuff like "6 gorillion" "The goyim know" etc on every video that you watch, and pat yourself on the back for your heroic deeds while you wait for the Endsieg!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTn5hgCj51g
We must sacrifice our rational minds in favor of herdlike zeal without expectations or demands from the individuals in our group!
We must grow overcompensating biceps and pectoralis muscles that make us slow, useless in a fight and are needlessly calorie consuming, because Glorious-MaKedon-aesthetics > Utility.
We must have fasci haircuts, because Paul commands us goyim males to have short hair in the New Testament (to show our slave status to yahweh)
The way to victory is the alt-right, and let me detail the steps.
1: Talk about racial purity alot but always applaud our half-breed-3rd-world, "high IQ" (lol) alt-right "leaders" like McCarthy etc.
2: Go to alot of demos so the system will be able to have all details about you in their database and so that Redox and antifa type doxing sites can slander and expose you.
3: Laugh condescendingly at preppers or people who take concrete action to be prepared in the (inevitable) event of societal breakdown - instead, suggest to others that they should become active in local democratic politics, and accuse people with food stocks, ammo crates and weapons of being "larpers" (follow Mark Collett, the (((suspiciously big-nosed))), black-eyed ARCH-EUROPEAN! for more advice on this)
4: Snicker when someone says nigger, and relish that feeling of superiority at your massive red-pill wisdom and having done your duty for the day.
5: NEVER swear loyalty to a folk, tribe or family or your own honor. Instead, swear loyalty to abstract ideologies or memes (muh national socialism etc), so you can be like your fellow alt-righters, who rarely know the simplest basics of the history or traditions of their forefathers, but who apparently really care about preserving things they don't bother to investigate in the slightest.
6: Remember to be cool and edgy and lift weights on camera regularly. You must prove that you are stronger than a 14 year old and that you are gloriously competent enough to be able to bend your elbow while holding a metal object in your hand. REMEMBER to compare this to the feats of various viking or spartan kings, so that everyone can see you are the equal of such men.
Finally, make a youtube account with a happy merchant pic and say stuff like "6 gorillion" "The goyim know" etc on every video that you watch, and pat yourself on the back for your heroic deeds while you wait for the Endsieg!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTn5hgCj51g
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
Globalism Boiled Down To It's Essence
I
saw a documentary before that was about the wealthy Chinese buying up
all the property in the main cities in Canada, Toronto etc. It was
horrendous. Canadians there for generation upon generation, and some
blow ins with truck loads of cash buying everything up and pricing
natives out of their own neighborhoods. People selling and moving
because the offers were too good to pass up. I think it was a journeyman
documentary on YouTube.
Chinese will inherit the Earth when Europeans roll over. If browns think the white man was evil, they haven't seen anything yet. Without Europeans creating and maintaining all these human rights orgs, the Chinese will do as they please.
Also, an added bonus to most of these browns and other urbanites, is that they live in cities. If you can afford it in the future, look to moving into the countryside. They'd never survive out there, because they don't have the agency required to learn survival skills and/or farming. All they care about is "muh dick" and "where da white wimmin at?!"
This is what globalism is. That is what it boils down to. People being displaced by people from a country enjoying a boom. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum and you basically have a dystopian nightmare of a constant underclass of wandering 'labour' and 'economic units' moving from place to place as work becomes abundant and non-existent on a cyclical wheel of unabated capitalism. While the wealthy cosmopolitan upperclass sneer and wrinkle their noses as the once majority native people are herded away by their henchmen and bodyguards so they needn't be exposed to the consequences of their choices. Not that it would affect them either way.
Chinese will inherit the Earth when Europeans roll over. If browns think the white man was evil, they haven't seen anything yet. Without Europeans creating and maintaining all these human rights orgs, the Chinese will do as they please.
Also, an added bonus to most of these browns and other urbanites, is that they live in cities. If you can afford it in the future, look to moving into the countryside. They'd never survive out there, because they don't have the agency required to learn survival skills and/or farming. All they care about is "muh dick" and "where da white wimmin at?!"
This is what globalism is. That is what it boils down to. People being displaced by people from a country enjoying a boom. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum and you basically have a dystopian nightmare of a constant underclass of wandering 'labour' and 'economic units' moving from place to place as work becomes abundant and non-existent on a cyclical wheel of unabated capitalism. While the wealthy cosmopolitan upperclass sneer and wrinkle their noses as the once majority native people are herded away by their henchmen and bodyguards so they needn't be exposed to the consequences of their choices. Not that it would affect them either way.
Thursday, 19 October 2017
Wednesday, 18 October 2017
European (((Christian))) morality
"As far as Europe is Christian, it is (in the ethical and spiritual
sense) Jewish; as far as Europe is moral, it is Jewish. Almost all
European ethics are rooted in Judaism. All champions of religious or
irreligious Christian morality, from Augustine to Rousseau, Kant and
Tolstoy, were Jews by choice in the spiritual sense; Nietzsche is the
only non-Jewish, the only pagan ethicist in Europe. The most prominent
and the foremost proponents of Christian ideas which are present in its
modern reincarnation are pacifism and socialism, and these are Jewish."
- Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, Praktischer Idealismus, 1925.
- Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, Praktischer Idealismus, 1925.
Sunday, 15 October 2017
Bane
Lately I've been wondering if the system is worth saving. If it's any use trying to keep something afloat that is predestined to failure and collapse. All civilizations fall, without exception. Nothing lasts forever. This is a simple law of nature. Without constant struggle, a people, a civilization wallows in degeneracy and decadence, brought about by a period of ease.
My mind is brought to the latest Batman film that I watched recently. Bane, and the League of Shadows. An organization that exists throughout the Christopher Nolan films of the 'Legend' trilogy. An organization of ninja like operatives with an ideology of utter rejection of degeneracy, corruption, greed... all the things rampant in civilization today. Of course, their MO is that of the villain, total and utter destruction, which Batman fights, to save his beloved Gotham, time and time again. Only to have to defend Gotham again against some new arising threat in the future.
It's at this point, I ask myself, is it better to follow Batmans example.... or Banes? On the one hand, Batman fights for the status quo. The protection of the system of law and order, of due process and trials. On the other, there is Bane. He fights for the total annihilation of the system. It's total and utter destruction. For something new, for something clean, for something without the ever present insidious growth of corruption. For a new society to grow from the ashes of the old. To be reborn anew, with the dead weight to be cut from the whole, for true prosperity to take root and uplift the people.
Which role is best for our current European predicament? Should we fight like Batman for nations which have completely let go of the very defining things that brought them into being? Their original homogeneous people, for the people of the world, given the ability to become any nationality they desire. Pieces of paper, making them our countrymen for no more than having fled their own nations. Are those the countries we want to protect? There is no political solution, and I realise it is not necessarily the nation we are protecting these days, but the people. However, the people today, in the mainstream, is any person who is considered a legal citizen of the nation. Why protect a system like this? Why not let it collapse in on top of itself? I'm beginning to think more in line with Bane than with Batman. The system cannot be usurped in our favour. They OWN the system! Why would they allow us to vote ourselves into power to depose them? They wouldn't. I also realise there is many nuances that would be argued here in favour of political action, but I put no stock in these arguments. If it could have been done in the 70 years since the end of the war, believe me, it would have. Better men have come before us, and failed, using that method.
No, I think it is time for something else entirely. Time to pull out of the system as much as humanly possible and as much as each of our circumstances allow. There is no saving a drowning beast with it's teeth bared in your direction. All you'll achieve is a nasty bite and contract an infection to slowly kill you off as you struggle against an ever rising tide, only to sink deeper into the murky depths and to be forgotten by man, and history.
It's time for a new system. A new method.
My mind is brought to the latest Batman film that I watched recently. Bane, and the League of Shadows. An organization that exists throughout the Christopher Nolan films of the 'Legend' trilogy. An organization of ninja like operatives with an ideology of utter rejection of degeneracy, corruption, greed... all the things rampant in civilization today. Of course, their MO is that of the villain, total and utter destruction, which Batman fights, to save his beloved Gotham, time and time again. Only to have to defend Gotham again against some new arising threat in the future.
It's at this point, I ask myself, is it better to follow Batmans example.... or Banes? On the one hand, Batman fights for the status quo. The protection of the system of law and order, of due process and trials. On the other, there is Bane. He fights for the total annihilation of the system. It's total and utter destruction. For something new, for something clean, for something without the ever present insidious growth of corruption. For a new society to grow from the ashes of the old. To be reborn anew, with the dead weight to be cut from the whole, for true prosperity to take root and uplift the people.
Which role is best for our current European predicament? Should we fight like Batman for nations which have completely let go of the very defining things that brought them into being? Their original homogeneous people, for the people of the world, given the ability to become any nationality they desire. Pieces of paper, making them our countrymen for no more than having fled their own nations. Are those the countries we want to protect? There is no political solution, and I realise it is not necessarily the nation we are protecting these days, but the people. However, the people today, in the mainstream, is any person who is considered a legal citizen of the nation. Why protect a system like this? Why not let it collapse in on top of itself? I'm beginning to think more in line with Bane than with Batman. The system cannot be usurped in our favour. They OWN the system! Why would they allow us to vote ourselves into power to depose them? They wouldn't. I also realise there is many nuances that would be argued here in favour of political action, but I put no stock in these arguments. If it could have been done in the 70 years since the end of the war, believe me, it would have. Better men have come before us, and failed, using that method.
No, I think it is time for something else entirely. Time to pull out of the system as much as humanly possible and as much as each of our circumstances allow. There is no saving a drowning beast with it's teeth bared in your direction. All you'll achieve is a nasty bite and contract an infection to slowly kill you off as you struggle against an ever rising tide, only to sink deeper into the murky depths and to be forgotten by man, and history.
It's time for a new system. A new method.
Wednesday, 4 October 2017
Hitler’s Lover, Maria Reiter
Hitler's Lover, Maria Reiter
Maria Reiter (1909-1982), was one of the great (and little known) loves of Adolf Hitler’s life. He met her in 1926, when she was 16 years old and living in Berchtesgaden. Inexplicably, some historians doubt her story of a love affair with Hitler. But the evidence she presented is essentially iron-clad.
Not only did she have over a dozen love letters and postcards written in Hitler’s own hand, she also had numerous eyewitnesses attest to her affair with Hitler. Amazingly, Mimi Reiter provided the only first-hand account of what it was really like to have an intimate relationship with Adolf Hitler.
For this reason alone, her recollections are invaluable. Several intimates of Hitler such as Heinrich Hoffmann, Anni Winter, Gretl Braun and Wilma Schaub all knew about Mimi Reiter and confirmed the details of the liaison to American authorizes after World War II.
Maria Reiter was always called by Austrian diminutives by Hitler. He called her Mimi, Mimilein or Mizzerl and never by her given name, Maria. In a 1971 interview with Emil Maurice (Hitler’s chauffeur), Maurice admitted: “Hitler loved her with a crazy intensity. She was a girl he really could have married.” (Taped interview with Maurice, Toland papers, Library of Congress). Mimi Reiter gave several interviews in 1959, when she finally told the world her story of her love affair with Hitler. He first interview was in 1959 for the German magazine,Der Stern, to journalist Guenther Peis.
Mimi gave an additional interview to Bunte magazine in January, 1960, as well as to an American journalist in 1960 and again in 1989. Over the years, her story has been mistranslated or purposefully embellished. Various authors have added things to her reminiscences or blatantly altered her words.
The following article is taken from Der Stern magazine, 1959. Without any question, Mimi’s letters from Hitler are authentic and her recollections coincide accurately with Hitler’s movements at the time. It behooves some Hitler biographers to cast doubt on Reiter’s memories, since she proves he was normal sexually and enjoyed a completely normal intimate relationship with her over a period of several years. For the first time, here are Maria Reiter’s recollections translated into English.
The Unknown Lover: Fourteen Years after the End of the War, we Bring You a Woman who Claims She was Hitler’s Greatest Love (By Guenther Peis)
Maria Reiter was born in Berchtesgaden on December 23, 1909. In the summer of 1926, Fräulein Reiter was 16 years old and working at her sister’s clothing shop in downtown Berchtesgaden. Her older sister, Anni, was 21 years old and her legal guardian. Mimi lived with Anni and her husband, Gottfried Hehl.
In 1926, neither Anni or Mimi Reiter had never heard of the politician Adolf Hitler, even though he was then living on the Obersalzberg, a few miles north of Berchtesgaden. Mimi’s mother died on September 11, 1926. Her narrative picks up shortly after the death of her mother.
Maria Reiter begins her story:
About fourteen days after the death of my mother, my brother Richard came into our clothing shop. He told us that the radical politician, Adolf Hitler, was staying in the area and riding around town in a huge super-charged Mercedes car. Richard seemed to evince a great fascination with this Hitler person, though I had never heard of him at that time.
When Richard was telling us about Hitler, suddenly a man stopped outside our clothing shop and seemed to be window shopping. It just so happened that it was Adolf Hitler himself that was just then outside our little shop. Richard immediately said, ‘Look there, there is Hitler, what a coincidence! That’s him, that’s the man I was just talking to you about, Adolf Hitler.’
With these words my brother sealed my future fate. My sister Anni and I ran to the front door of the shop and started at this supposedly famous man. I will never forget my first site of Adolf Hitler. He was wearing white knee socks, a blue windbreaker and some Lederhosen. He was walking an absolutely gorgeous German shepherd dog with him. At that first moment, the dog impressed me more than Hitler. I later discovered the dog’s name was Prinz.
A few days later, I got to meet Adolf Hitler. Our first conversation took place in the Berchtesgaden Kurpark. The park had many benches where people could rest and talk. One afternoon I took our German shepherd, Marko, to the Park during my lunch break. Anni, my older sister, was with me during out lunch break.
Suddenly I saw Hitler coming out of his Hotel and walking in our direction. My heart raced because our brother Richard had told us he was an important man. Suddenly this political celebrity was standing right in front of Anni and he made a gallant bow.
Mimi then told us what happened exactly:
“Hitler was extremely polite and formal. He bowed twice and then said very correctly to Anni, 'Excuse me, gracious miss, would you please tell me who the beautiful blonde girl is there, on the bench next to you?’
Hitler nodded his head in Mimi’s direction. Her knees were trembling.
"Hitler continued talking to my sister: 'I saw this young lady yesterday when she was walking a nice dog here in the park. May I please ask who she is?’”
Anni looked up at the intense man and said, “that is my younger sister.”
Hitler smiled and said, “You would make me so happy if you would introduce me to her.”
Mimi Reiter looked back on this scene and smiled knowingly. She describes her impressions:
“Of course I was noticing Hitler and heard everything he said to my sister. But I had to admit that my first impressions were not very favorable. I didn’t like his mustache, I thought it looked a little funny. But I did think he was fashionably dressed.”
Mimi was very shy at the age of 16 and had never had a male acquaintance, especially one who was 37 years old, and quite an old man for her tastes. She pretended to be engrossed with her German shepherd and pretended also not to be overhearing Hitler’s chat with Anni.
Mimi describes her first words with Hitler:
“He seemed very nervous before speaking to me. I noticed how he took his whip and kept moving it from his left hand to his right hand, awkwardly. Then he bowed slightly to me, took my right hand very tenderly into his right hand and then stared at me for an inordinately long time. It was a very penetrating stare ("er schaute mich mit durchdringenden Blicken an”).
Hitler then said to me, “Your dog is very beautiful and well behaved,” all the while giving me a penetrating and intense look. “I know how to train dogs, it’s a complicated business,” he said.
Mimi was uncomfortable with Hitler’s intensive staring.
“I have never been with a man before,” she admits now. “I had never been on a date alone, I had never been kissed by a man. And this man was far older than me. I was very afraid.”
Mimi then answered Hitler, “I didn’t train my dog, Herr Hitler. My brother-in-law did so.”
Maria Reiter admits now, “My answers were clipped and short. I was only 16 years old and this 'old man’ Hitler had sat down right next to me on the bench and was staring at me in a provocative way.”
Hitler kept the chat to the subject of German shepherds. “I can’t imagine my life without Prinz,” he told her, while studying her face and her legs. He wasn’t paying any attention to Prinz, but staring with unblinking eyes at Mimi Reiter.
The conversation lasted slightly more than one hour and consisted mostly of chatting about dogs. Mimi got up the courage to ask him if it was true that he had been in prison. Hitler laughed and admitted he had indeed been incarcerated. During this time, his eyes consistently hung on Mimi, making her very uncomfortable.
Finally it was time for the sisters to return to their shop to re-open the business for the afternoon. Hitler stood up and very formally bowed in front of Anni.
“May I ask your permission, dear lady, to take a walk with your younger sister some time?”
Mimi heard this, stood up and ran back to the shop without a word. After seeing this, Anni refused Hitler’s permission. She later told Mimi that she told Hitler, “please leave this matter alone. My sister is very young. Please respect that.”
Anni also told Hitler that Mimi was just 16 years old and that he was “far too old” for her. In any case, it had only been 2 weeks since their mother had died and she was in mourning.
Hitler said nothing, bowed again and turned back to walk into his hotel. Anni thought the matter was concluded, but she was quite mistaken.
Though Mimi had spontaneously run away from the 37 year old politician, he had made an impression on her at first glance.
“I have to admit,” she says now, “that he was very dashing. He dressed very well and memorably. His blue eyes were amazing to gaze into. There’s nothing to compare them to. He was really very imposing and special to meet. The only think I didn’t like at first glance was his mustache, I thought to myself that if any woman kissed him, his mustache would tickle them.”
During the next two days, the Reiter sisters neither saw or heard from Hitler. But on the third day, he suddenly showed up at their clothing shop, walking into the door all by himself. Within seconds, his friend, Max Amann, followed him into the shop.
Max Amann engaged Anni in conversation while Hitler tried to monopolize Mimi. He asked her to take a walk with him. His specific destination was the Hochlenzer, a restaurant on the Obersalzberg that Hitler frequented.
Mimi said to him that the area was her homeland and she knew the Hochlenzer very well. She said, “I am at the Hochlenzer every Saturday and Sunday, you could find me there then.”
A little bit sarcastically, she then said to Hitler, “naturally I only go there with my close girlfriends or my relatives.” After a pause she said, “of course I’ve never there with some strange older man.”
Hitler looked at her searchingly with a penetrating gaze but was silent. He then bowed, left the shop and said nothing to Mimi.
Two hours later, Hitler’s friend and associate, Max Amann, suddenly appeared in the Reiter clothing shop. It was very obvious that Hitler had personally asked to come on this mission. Amann tersely greeted Anni and then took Mimi aside to talk to her privately.
Amann said, “Tonight at the Hotel Deutsches Haus (in Berchtesgaden), Hitler is going to give a speech. And he asked me to ask you, Miss Mimi, if you would like to see him give his speech this evening?” Mimi noticed the invitation was only for her, not for Anni. Happily, Anni then interjected that she cared nothing for politics and that Mimi had her permission to go and see Hitler that evening.
Mimi admitted, “I was afraid, especially when Herr Amann said to me, 'Naturally Hitler has to give a speech first, but he wants you know that afterwards, he wants to spend time with you. Of course you understand that afterwards, he’d like very much to sit with you alone.”
Mimi agreed to attend but demanded that her older sister attend as well, as a “chaperone.” Amann tried to convince her otherwise, but Mimi insisted, so Anni broke down and went with her younger sister.
That evening, the two Reiter sisters attended a Nazi rally at the Hotel Deutsches Haus. Everyone in the audience turned to look at them as they walked in and were seated in the front row at Hitler’s private table. Their presence created quite a stir in the hall, as most locals knew the sisters from their clothing shop.
Mimi remembers, “after we were seated, I looked up to see Hitler sitting on the podium, waiting to give his speech. He saw me and smiled, jumping down from the stage to greet me. He said, "Mimi, you have no idea how happy I am that you made the time to come and hear me.”
Mimi continued, “he pulled up my chair for me and gently pushed it back in. I’d never had a man pay attention to me, my father had been very brutal to me. But Hitler was kind and so gentle. I started to like him a little bit more after he began to show me affection.”
Hitler called over a waitress and had her bring Mimi some Sprudel (a non-alcoholic German sparking drink, like a Seven Up), and also some mineral water. Hitler asked if she was happy with her seat and her drink, then mounted the podium again, waiting to take center stage.
Maria Reiter was intensely embarrassed and became very red in the face.
“I had the impression,” she says, “that he arranged this entire speech just for me. He later told me, years later, that this was his way of conquering me. He knew he was a very gifted speaker, and that if I saw him orate, I would fall for him.”
When Hitler began his speech, Mimi became enthralled very quickly. He continued to embarrass her by how he behaved on the stage.
“He just kept fixing his eyes on me,” Mimi says. “His stare was always very intense. He kept looking at me, directly in my eyes, over and over. It was so obvious even my sister Anni was embarrassed for me. Hitler was anything but discreet. He was just speaking to me and me alone. I will never forget how uncomfortable and exposed I felt, though also I admit I was quite flattered.”
Mimi noticed that many other women in the audience seemed to want Hitler and they appeared very jealous of the pretty girl sitting at his table. Several of the women openly sneered or taunted Mimi during and after the speech.
When the talk ended, Hitler went to Anni and told her the meeting had been illegal because he was banned from speaking in Germany. Anni was so shaken by this news, she asked to take Mimi home. Hitler hesitated and asked if he might accompany her home in a short while. Anni agreed and left the hall, and Hitler then took Mimi to a private room, adjacent to where he had just delivered his fiery speech. Hitler arranged it so he and Mimi could sit closely together, though there were several other people at the same table, including two young girls who knew Hitler and who were very attached to him. Mimi does not remember their names but said, “they knew Hitler much better than I and they were staring daggers at me because he was paying attention only to me.”
Hitler told me in Munich months later that women were always chasing after him, that he could pick and choose whoever he wanted, but that he wanted Mimi alone.
Hitler’s chauffeur, Emil Maurice, then rejoined the group and took the two other young girls to another table, leaving Hitler and Mimi alone. Hitler became so intensively tactile with Mimi that it made her very uncomfortable.
“I was only 16,” she says, “He was a grown man and becoming very familiar with me. I liked him, but he was still just a strange old man to me!”
The budding Fuehrer took both of Mimi’s hands tenderly in his. He held her hands tightly underneath the table and asked her if she had understood his speech. She said that she had liked the speech and was afraid he would ask her to repeat little details. She was relieved when they were interrupted by a waitress and she never had to volunteer anything about his oration.
Hitler then began to call her “Du,” (the intimate form of saying “you” in German, reserved for close friends, family and lovers).
Mimi then said, “he started to take little liberties with me, slowly. He cut up some cake with a knife and started gently feeding me the cake with his fingers. He fed me like I was a little child, patting my hair and putting his hands on my brow (Traudl Junge, Hitler’s secretary from 1943-45 said, "Hitler hated being touched, but he oftentimes would put his fingers on people’s brows.”)
The charm of the Fuehrer knew no bounds and he was pulling out all the stops. He treated her one moment like a tender child, and the next moment, flirted with her as if she was a 30 year old woman. It was a sophisticated way to make inroads with a teenage girl and he made a huge impression on the her.
After a few hours, Hitler asked Mimi about her recently deceased mother. He spoke about how he had loved his own mother, who he said had died right before Christmas.
He told Mimi, “you have the same lovely blue eyes that my dear mother had.” All the while, Mimi noticed Emil Maurice and the two other Berchtesgaden girls, moving to a more distant table. She was increasingly isolated and more alone with Hitler. It occurred to her that Hitler had planned this beforehand with Emil Maurice. He later admitted to her that he had indeed pre-planned this first step in his seduction of her.
Hitler then laid his hands on her shoulders, pulling her towards him.
Mimi recalled, “I could feel the warmth of his hands on me and he whispered, 'I want to accompany you to the grave of your mother, would you allow that?’”
In the middle of this flirtation, one of the girls from the other table, Ernestine Metke, said, “Herr Hitler, tell us why you have never married?”
Then Hitler became even more cozy with Mimi, as she recalls today:
“When Miss Metke asked her curious question, Hitler suddenly pressed his knee very firmly against my thigh and then he stepped on my shoe with his shoe, exerting a lot of pressure. He was practically crushing my toes with his shoe. I knew he was sending me a signal, especially when he answered the girl. Hitler said, 'I will only marry a girl that I truly and deeply love. Who knows when and if that will ever happen?’”
Hitler then looked at Mimi with a “blazing look” and continued to press his knee against her thigh. Then he suggested that he accompany her to her home.
When they arrived at Anni and Gottfried’s home, both were asleep. Max Amann waited patiently in the anteroom by the back door. Mimi prepared she and Hitler both some tea and then realized it was past midnight. Hitler said he was tired and wanted to go back to his hotel. It was then she noticed that Max Amann was no longer in the house but had left.
She was completely alone with his mysterious older man.“Hitler was looking at me again with that uncomfortably intense look,” she admits. “He came closer to me, so close that I could feel his breath on my cheek. He then took me tenderly by the shoulders and caressed my cheek with hi index finger. 'Won’t you give me a goodbye kiss?” he said.
Though Mimi was beginning to like Hitler, she was still a very young girl of 16 and was afraid. She said, “No, Herr Hitler, I’ve never been kissed before and I cannot kiss you.”
Hitler looked at her searchingly for a long time, then said, “If you really can’t do this, if you are too afraid to move forward, then we must not see each other again. Really. We can’t meet each other again, it would cause us both too much pain. Don’t you want the same thing I want?”
Mimi recalls that Hitler’s forehead knitted together and he scowled. His mouth suddenly became very narrow and pinched, the pain was evident in his eyes. Everything that had been warm and inviting in his face had turned cold.
Hitler then tore the blue curtain to one side, said “Heil!” abruptly and called for Amann outside, who came scurrying up to meet his friend.
Anni ran out to the parlor when she heard Hitler yelling for Amann and asked what had happened. Mimi was silent and confesses now that she returned to her bedroom and cried for several hours. She was attracted to Hitler, but scared of him at the same time due to her youth and inexperience.
However, the romance had not ended, in fact it was just beginning. The next morning, at 10:00 a.m., Max Amann came into the dress shop of the Reiter sisters. He immediately approached Mimi and motioned her to the back room.
“See here,” Amann said to her, “what has happened? I’ve known Hitler for many years and I’ve never seen him in such a state. He poured out his heart to me. You must believe me: this man has completely fallen for you! ("Hitler hat mir sein Herz ausgeschuettet: Glauben Sie mir: Der Mann hat Feuer gefangen.”)
Amann made a deal with Mimi: she should write Hitler a little note, telling him she would be happy for another meeting. At first Mimi refused, until her older sister took her aside and suggested she should write him. “He’s a very special man,” she instructed her younger sister. Then Mimi reneged and wrote Hitler a few affectionate lines.
A half an hour later, Hitler himself came into the shop, wearing once more his Lederhosen and white shirt. Mimi recalls that he was in a wonderful mood, smiling, flirting and laughing. He immediately suggested they all make an excursion to the Starnberger See, a lake near Munich. Hitler added that Emil Maurice would drive and that Anni was also invited. Mimi agreed to go.
The next day, a Sunday, at 3:00 in the afternoon, Hitler’s black Mercedes drove up and the two sisters got into the car. Hitler cleverly arranged that Anni sit in the front with Maurice and that Mimi would sit by him in the rear seat. But Hitler and Maurice picked up the sisters not in front of their shop, but 8 blocks away. Hitler told Mimi later, “Berchtesgaden is a small town and people gossip. I want no one gossiping about such a young girl as yourself. Also in my position I can’t afford any idle chatter.”
When Hitler and Maurice picked up the sisters, Hitler hand sprung out of the car and helped Mimi into the back seat. He had a leather helmet and some gloves in the backseat, but he didn’t put them on.
Mimi continued, “My sister Anni had to do an errand for the church and Maurice let her out. Then Hitler told his driver to take up to Bischofswiesen (a small town near Berchtesgaden). After my sister left the car, Hitler immediately began to become more intimate with me. Maurice was driving and not paying us any attention in the backseat. Hitler took my hand in his and gently ran his hands over my face and neck. It was thrilling but also a little unsettling.”
After several minutes, Hitler instructed Maurice to stop the car, he wanted to walk around the forest for a little while. He assisted Mimi out of the car, held her hand, and they walked towards the forest.
“Hitler and I walked a little ways until we reached a beautiful clearing, with the sun coming through the trees,” Mimi remembers. “He made me stand quite still in front of a tree. He turned me left and right, studying my face. He was smiling and looking at me. I wondered what he was doing. and I asked him.”
“Hitler said, 'just stand there exactly as a you are. He stood about 5 paces away from me and was staring at my face, my chest and my legs. Then he stretched his arms out to me and beckoned me to him. 'Do you know what you are now, Mimilein?’ he asked, 'now you are my woodland sprite!’”
Mimi laughed at him and asked what he exactly meant, but Hitler silenced her.
“When you’re older, Mimi, you’ll understand me better, and by the way, you should never laugh at me.”
Then Mimi’s narrative of their first kiss continues: “Hitler then came up to me, grabbed me by the shoulders and passionately kissed me. He kissed me for the first time wildly, stormily and completely unrestrained. He pressed me too him very tightly and whispered, "Mimilein, my beautiful girl, I can’t stop myself anymore, I can’t restrain myself.”
Maria Reiter remembers that Hitler “completely enveloped my upper body with his, crushing me to him. He wrapped his arms around my body and kissed me passionately for a long time, over and over He didn’t know what he should do, he was clearly struggling with containing his feelings. He said several times between kisses, "Mimilein, I want you just way too much. What I feel for you is quite simply everything, kiss me, Mimi.”
Hitler’s romantic overtures were successful. Mimi found she enjoyed kissing this older man who had so much repressed passion for her. For 20 minutes they stood in the forest, kissing with wild abandon.
“I was so happy, I wanted to die in the forest,” Mimi admits. “Hitler kept looking at me with this wild intensity, almost like an animal let loose from a cage. His kisses were bruising and searching, he kissed me on the mouth, the forehead, the neck. I saw how excited he was, I saw how he was struggling with himself and trying to contain his passion, how he balled up his fists and kept trying to hold back.”
“Mimi,” Hitler whispered to her, “I could just crush you right now, right now at this moment.”
Finally after more than a half an hour of fervent kissing and petting, Hitler led Mimi back to the car, where Maurice was patiently waiting. As they walked back to the Mercedes, Hitler would stop a few times and kiss her again, or press her to his chest. He told her she was his ideal woman and under normal circumstances, he could marry her and have children, but first his great mission had to be fulfilled. He didn’t elaborate on what this “mission” (Sendung) was.
When they both reached the car, Hitler was in a glorious mood.
“So, Moritzl, let’s turn around and go back to the town!” Hitler then took both of Mimi’s hands and placed them in his lap. In the car, he gently took his fingers and closed her eyes, telling her to “sleep and dream.” He kissed her forehead and neck and squeezed her hands so tightly she thought he would crush her fingers.
The next day, Hitler visited the shop and took Mimi for a walk in the Kurpark. He asked if he could finally accompany her to the grave of her mother. Mimi agreed. He came around to Anni’s home that evening at 8:00.
Mimi described the scene:
“It was a chilly night, but he was dressed as he was the first day I saw him, with Lederhosen, a blue tie and a white shirt. As always, he was carrying his riding whip with him. We walked hand in hand to the cemetery in town and we stood looking down at the grave of my mother. Hitler bent down and lit two candles and was very solemn. I noticed the muscles in his neck knot together as he was staring down at the grave.”
“I began to cry, because I had only lost my dear mother so recently. I cried for several minutes. Hitler then took both my hands in his hands and pressed my head against his chest, cradling me. Then he pressed his forehead against my cheek and whispered to me, 'I am not like that yet.’”
What Hitler meant with that sentence is not entirely clear. Hitler then gently kissed her at her mother’s grave and said, “Listen to me, my sweet girl. From now on, I want you to call me 'Wolf,’ nothing else.” As they walked away from the cemetery, Hitler took the long way back to her sister’s home and took the time to again kiss her passionately and speak to her how attracted he was to her.
Hitler also for the first time told her that he loved her that evening on the walk.
Mimi said, “his kisses had broken up my reserve. He was very passionate and very forceful, yet also gentle. I found myself not wanting to be away from his embrace, I believe I was already beginning to fall in love with this man.”
Hitler did not attempt to go into the house with her, instead, he formally kissed her hand, clicked his heels and told her he would see her in the morning.
Sadly, the next day brought Mimi some bad news. Hitler told her that he was leaving Berchtesgaden for a few weeks, but he wanted her to write to him care of his landlady in Munich, Frau Dachs. Then Maurice turned up in the huge Mercedes and they took another drive to a secluded spot in the forest.
Once more Hitler and Mimi walked through the trees until Hitler stooped and began kissing her wildly again. He said, “Mimi, you’re everything to me, you are so beautiful, I want you so badly.”
Mimi admitted, “it was then that I started to fall completely in love with this man. He was so passionate, so full of energy and some strange spark, that I felt myself yearning to be with him. I was devastated that he was leaving me and travelling away. I wanted nothing more at that moment that to be with him in any way he wanted.”
Before Hitler left Berchtesgaden for his political trip, he gave Mimi a huge box of chocolate. He told her to eat it in bed every night at 10:00 and he would do the same, and they could think of each other.
During the next month, the couple exchanged many love letters. Hitler sent her candy, some jewelry and even a lock of his hair. He returned to Berchtesgaden in November. The couple resumed their relationship, though Hitler did not attempt to have sexual intercourse with her.
Mimi said, “it was difficult for us to be alone. We would steal moments together when we could, but it was next to impossible to be alone together for extended periods of time. Hitler was very tender and affectionate to me, but we were not yet lovers.”
Once more Hitler disappeared for a month, once more the couple exchanged letters and cards. Here is one of Hitler’s letters to her, dated , dated December 16, 1926:
My dear little Mimi:
You don’t know how much you have come to mean to me. I would so love to have your beautiful and sweet face in front of me so I could personally tell you what you mean to me. December 23 is your birthday. Now I beg of you to take my greeting which comes from the depth of my heart.
From my present (the two-volume edition of Mein Kampf), you should see how pleased I am that my sweet love is writing so often to me. You have no idea how happy a sweet little letter from you will make me. Out of it your lovely voice speaks to me. And then I always taken by a desire for you as if it was the first time. Are you also sometimes thinking of me? Tell me so and write me.
You know Mimi, whenever I have trouble or cares, I would so much like to be with you, to be able to look into your eyes in order to forget all of life’s cares. Yes, Mizzerl, you recall how much you mean to me and how deeply I love you. But read the books! Then you will be able to understand me.
Now again my sincerest best wishes for your birthday and for Christmas with my whole heart.
From your own
Wolf
———
On December 23, 1926, Mimi Reiter turned 17. To her surprise and happiness, Hitler turned up in their clothing shop, totally unexpectedly.
Mimi recalled, “Wolf was in a wonderful mood, so happy and like a boy. I was thrilled to see him again. He wished me a happy birthday and gave me a beautiful gold wristwatch. The next day we celebrated Christmas together, while me sister and my brother-in-law were absent from the house. I was more than ready to offer myself to Hitler, but he was cautious about this and had a mania for privacy. He told me that as hard as it was for him to wait, we simply had to wait for 'the right time.’”
The 'right time’ occurred in early March, 1927. Mimi was an excellent ice skater and at that time, took part in many competitions. She travelled by herself by rail to Munich to take place in an ice skating event.
She recalls:
“I was taking my practice laps when I looked up and saw Hitler and Emil Maurice sitting on one of the benches in the ice skating hall. I was so thrilled at seeing Wolf, I wanted to break off the competition just to see him. We chatted a little while and he insisted I compete. But I was so distracted by Wolf’s presence, I fell and didn’t even get a medal.”
After the event, Maurice drove Hitler and Mimi to his local restaurant, the Café Heck, by the Odeonsplatz in Munich. Maurice discreetly left them alone in a back table. Hitler immediately began talking to Mimi of his future plans with her.
Mimi continues:
“We sat there for over two hours. The only gloomy moment was when I ordered Schnitzel. Wolf glowered and said, 'Mimilein, how can you eat the flesh of animals? That is made from veal, how can you eat that?”
The table where they were seated was completely screened off from the other patrons, so Hitler took liberties with the young girl.
“He pressed his forehead against my neck, over and over, whispering to me how much he loved me, how much he wanted to spend his life with me and how beautiful I was. He kept saying, "Mimi, you have no idea how much I love you, do you love me too?”
After the meal, Maurice picked them up. In the backseat, Hitler kissed Mimi repeatedly and said, “You’re never going to be separated from me again, Mimchen. Did you hear me? When I get a bigger apartment, you have to stay with me, always. We’ll pick out everything together: the pictures, the chairs, the furniture. I can see everything already: a beautiful long sofa in violet plush.”
Yes, Hitler spent the car drive talking about living with Mimi in Munich. Of course she was thinking about marriage, he was not thinking of marriage at all, but only of living together. But she didn’t know that yet.
Maurice drove Hitler and Mimi to a street near the Isar. When they got out of the car, Hitler told Mimi this was his apartment in Munich (41 Thierschstrasse). He said, “I know you’d like to change out of your skating dress, you can do so here.” Mimi agreed and noticed that Maurice drove away. It was midday and Hitler escorted her up the stairs one flight, to his modest apartment on the right side of the hallway.
Mimi says, “Though by then I was very deeply in love with Wolf, I was still unsure and afraid. I knew what was going to happen, and it was what we both wanted, but I was a young girl.”
Mimi naively asked Hitler to turn his back while she changed. Obediently, he took a chair and sat in it, pretending to look through a book. Mimi struggled out of her skating dress, but a button got stuck on her blue evening gown and she had to ask him to unfasten it.
“Hitler helped me with the button,” Mimi says, “and then he turned me around to face him. He crushed me to him and kissed me passionately. He gently rocked me back on my heels and lifted me into his arms, placing me on his simple iron bed. We made love there.”
According to Mimi, Hitler was “a total man.” She says, “these rumors that he could not make love to a woman are utterly false. He was 100% capable of it and was very patient and gentle with me, knowing that I was inexperienced in the ways of intimacy.”
For the next several hours, Hitler and Mimi spent in each others arms in his dingy flat in Munich.
When he finally got up from the bed, he turned and said, “My dear darling, I have another surprise for you. Tonight I have tickets at the Gaertnerplatz Theater for Zirkusprinzessin. We can sit together and spend the evening this way.”
Maurice and a certain woman named Dr. Ida Arnold accompanied them. Mimi had the impression that Dr. Arnold and Maurice were a romantic couple. During the intermission, Hitler explained to Mimi that it was too dangerous for her to spend the evening in his apartment, and that she would have to spend the night in Dr. Arnold’s guest bedroom at her apartment.
That evening, Dr. Arnold asked Mimi many intrusive questions about Hitler.
“She saw that we loved each other,” Mimi said. “That night was very special for us both, we were both glowing with love, she noticed it and asked me if I thought Hitler would ever marry me. I remember her being very irate when she found out I was just 17 years old. I looked older and she was upset by that.”
The next day Hitler and Maurice drove Mimi back to the Munich train station, but he joined her in Berchtesgaden a few days later. For three weeks in April, 1927, the couple were together in Berchtesgaden.
“Wolf and I were able to steal many afternoons together at my sister and brother-in-law’s house. The mother of Gottfried was ill and both my sister and he were in Augsburg. Wolf and I spent many blissful hours there, it was by far the happiest time of my life. Wolf was very happy and told me every day how desperately he loved me. And I confess that I was terribly in love with him. Every moment with him was absolutely blissful. I dreamt of marrying him and having his children.”
But inevitably, Hitler’s political mission interrupted this idyll. Again he left Berchtesgaden, again he was gone for weeks or months at a time.
In July, he finally returned to Berchtesgaden. But curiously, he didn’t stop to see Mimi. In fact, she saw him walk by the clothing shop and he didn’t even come inside.
“I was devastated,” Mimi says today. “I was never so desolate in my life. I watched the man I love walk by the shop and ignore my existence. He was my first and my only lover, he was the man I knew I would someday marry. He never gave an explanation then. After a few hours, I began to cry. I began to cry hysterically. I imagined Wolf with other women, there were always women chasing him. I felt as if he didn’t love me anymore. I wanted to die. A life without him was a life I did not want to live.”
The next day, Mimi took a clothesline and tied it around her neck. She tied the other end around a doorknob and slammed the door shut, attempting to commit suicide. She fell to the floor unconscious. Several hours later, her brother in law, Gottfried Hehl, discovered her and rushed to a doctor. Mimi recovered and Gottfried Hehl sought out Hitler immediately to demand why he had stopped seeing Mimi.
(At this point, the article explains how Dr. Ida Arnold had been writing anonymous letters to the Nazi Party HQ, claiming she had personal knowledge that Hitler was “seducing young girls in Berchtesgaden.” Hitler told Helh that over 8 such letters had been received and he could not afford any political scandal. He told Hehl, “I love Mimi with my whole heart, please tell her this, but I have to remain distant from her for awhile.”
Mimi had to sign a sworn statement that she and Hitler were merely “friends." On May 10, 1930, Mimi Reiter married an Austrian hotel owner in Innsbruck. She admitted she "did not love him, but I was lonely.”)
Mimi remembered, “In 1928 and 1929 Wolf wrote me some more letters and cards (all of which still exist). He sent me a beautiful wedding present and a silver goblet with his engraved name on it. I still loved him passionately and my marriage was unhappy from the start.”
Then the death of Hitler’s niece, Geli Raubal, changed everything for both Hitler and for Mimi Reiter. Geli Raubal died on September 19, 1931. In early October, 1931, a man that Mimi recognized was standing in front of her at the hotel she ran in Innsbruck.
“My name is Hess,” the man with the prominent eyebrows told her. “Herr Hitler sent me. He wants to know if you are happy.”
Mimi looked at him and said immediately, “No!” Hess asked her what message he should convey to Hitler.
Mimi said, “Tell him that I am extremely happy that he sent you to ask me this question. Tell him that I would love to see him again.”
Mimi remembers: “My heart was in my throat when Hess drove away. He had handed me Hitler’s private telephone number to his apartment. Naturally this stirred up all my old memories of Wolf. My husband and I were already separated and our marriage had been very short and miserably unhappy. All I wanted at that moment was to see Wolf again.”
Mimi wasted little time. She left Seefeld two days later and took the train to Munich. At the railway station she called Hitler. At first a woman answered (probably Frau Anni Winter, Hitler’s housekeeper). Mimi waited a few moments and called again. This time Hitler himself answered the phone.
“When he heard my voice, he was very happy and touched. He said to me, "Mizzerl, where are you? I want you to come to me, do you hear me? I want you this very minute. He asked me if I still loved him. I started to cry and said, 'I can’t tell you that over the telephone.’”
Hitler instructed Mimi to get a taxi and drive to the apartment of Julius Schaub, his adjutant. When she arrived there, Schaub then accompanied her in a taxi to Hitler’s apartment on the Prinzregentenplatz. It was around noon when Schaub escorted her to Hitler’s flat.
Mimi Reiter:
“Schaub walked me into the large living room. I had never been to this apartment, I had only seen Wolf’s prior dwelling. This was far more luxurious, in a nicer part of town and it was so nice and almost 'swanky.’ There didn’t seem to be anyone stirring in the apartment at all, it was silent. Schaub left. About five minutes later, Hitler moved a curtain aside and suddenly was standing there in a dark blue suit. He looked somehow imposing, he looked more mature and worldy-wise than my dear Wolf from the 1920’s.”
Hitler walked up to Mimi and took her into his arms.
“He was very tender and correct with me,” Mimi remembers. I was trembling to be with him again, but at first, he wanted only to talk. Whenever I could want to caress him or hold him, he gently said, “later, there is plenty of time for that, later…” and he asked me extensively about my husband. I confessed to him that I had run away and abandoned my husband and that I wanted to divorce him. Hitler was furious, not out of any moral reason, but because he was concerned my husband might gain an advantage in the divorce proceedings.
Mimi: “We talked for two hours. Then he suggested we go on an excursion to the Tegernsee. Schaub went with us with his new driver, Schreck. We had a picnic and Wolf and I were able to spend some private time alone together, where finally he showed me physical affection and told me he still loved me deeply and truly.”
Schreck drove the couple back to Hitler’s apartment.
Mimi Reiter: we had already eaten a hearty snack at the Tegernsee. We arrived back to Hitlers deserted apartment around 8:00 in the evening. Schreck and Schaub disappeared. For two hours we talked about the past and he mentioned the death of his beloved niece, an event which Schaub had mentioned to me.
“I asked Hitler if I could move to Munich and if he could arrange for me to get some kind of job. He laughed and said 'you’re never going to work. You’re going to stay with me, From this moment on, you belong to me and I am going to take your life into my hands.’”
Hitler then got up from the sofa, dimmed the lights and returned to Mimi, taking his hands and caressing her face and hair.
Mimi: “Wolf pressed me to him and kissed me. We kissed each other for a long time and it felt as if no time had elapsed since our old love affair from 1927. It was a little past midnight and he leaned me further and further back on his couch. He grabbed me more and more tightly. I let everything happen to me. It was what we both had always wanted and we had been denied it for 4 years. I was never so happy in my life as that night when we were alone in his apartment.”
“Around 2:30 at night, Wolf finally straightened up from the sofa and stood up. He brought me a silk robe and wrapped me up in it and then snuggled with me.”
“He whispered to me, "Mimilein, you know that now I’m rich. I can offer you everything and anything you want. I can create a paradise for you. Just stay with me. My darling angel, I love you very, very much. Tell me you love me and that you will always stay with me.”
Mimi told Hitler with great tenderness that she loved him as much as loved her. But then she said something he didn’t like.
“Wolf,” Mimi said to him, “I love you more than I have ever loved anyone, but I’m not suited to be a mistress, hidden away from the world. I want to be with you, but I can’t be happy just seeing you at your convenience and waiting for you to visit me. Surely you can understand that?”
Mimi recalls that Hitler was snuggled with her on his sofa and suddenly became angry. He stood up and turned away from her.
“What are you demanding of me?” he said in an angry voice. “What am I supposed to give up for a woman? I love you. I have always loved you and I have always wanted you. But I want to have you here, right here, in my apartment. I want you to understand something: I’ve never had a relationship with a woman like I have had with you. Do you know that?”
They spent the rest of the night, arguing and making love. The next morning, Mimi returned to Austria, but Hitler repeatedly phoned her when he was on the road busy with politics. Throughout 1932, he arranged four or five clandestine meetings with Mimi.
She recalls: “Twice we met at the apartment of Max Amann. He was from Munich and had maintained a dwelling there for many years. Max Amann knew Wolf very well and he knew me from the old days. Wolf and I would spend two or three hours together, and they were the most blissful hours of my life. I never could get enough of him, nor he or me. He always told me how much he loved me and consistently tried to persuade me to remain with him as his mistress in his apartment.”
Twice more they met in Hitler’s Munich apartment, after a night at the opera.
“Wolf continually told me he wanted me to be his lover in Munich. I was perfectly willing to accept that role because of my great love for him, but I also insisted that eventually we must marry. I also wanted to have children. This would enrage Wolf, who would throw up his hands and say, "I love you! I can never marry, what about that can’t you understand!?’”
In 1932, Hitler arranged for his attorney, Hans Frank, to handle the divorce between Mimi and her Austrian husband. He was constantly gone from Munich and his trysts with Mimi in the Bavarian capitol became less frequent and Hitler was sometimes now distracted and rushed.
Their last intimate episode occurred in Munich, a few weeks before he was named Chancellor (let it be noted that Hitler was also sleeping with Eva Braun at this same time, and using the same sofa for “intimate purposes.”)
Mimi Reiter: “It was right after the New Year, 1933, a snowy night. Hitler summoned me to his apartment. We had a light meal of Semmeln and some chocolates and then we made love. I was always gloriously happy to be in his arms and to assure him how deeply loved he was. For several hours we were together, and then Hitler said to me very softly, "I love you and this is the last time I am going to ask you this. I want you to be here, with me. Here in the apartment. The fact I would even offer a divorced woman this opportunity is amazing to me.”
But Mimi rejected his proposal.
“I told him that under no circumstances could I live this way forever. I wanted to marry him, he was my lover and my life. I wanted to have children with him, be a normal person. I will never forget Hitler’s reaction. He was buttoning up his shirt and suddenly sprang up and had a rage, the only true rage I ever saw him have.
He screamed, "all you women just think about having children! I have a great mission to fulfill, you know I can never get married to anyone!”
Mimi was shocked. “It was a terrible scene. I was afraid someone would hear, it was three o'clock in the morning and even though we were alone, Hitler was very loud. He kept screaming he had his mission to fulfill and he didn’t have the time to devote to a wife and children. Finally he calmed down, we kissed each other and said goodbye.”
Mimi Reiter saw Hitler again in 1934, 1936 and 1938. They never had intimate relations again, and met merely as “friends.” She married Georg Kubisch in 1936 and Hitler personally congratulated Kubisch. He said to me, “So you’re the lucky man. Always treat this woman well, you are very fortunate to be having her.” When Kubisch died in France in 1940, Hitler sent Mimi 100 red roses. They exchanged several additional letters, but never met again.
Tuesday, 3 October 2017
Hungary under fire over ‘hate campaign’ against philanthropist Soros
If anyone was still in any doubt as to the power and influence of the people trying to destabilize the planet, the west in particular, should look no further than the case of Soros and Hungary. Hungary’s populist government has launched a new attack on billionaire liberal philanthropist George Soros, with what a major international human rights group called an “official hate campaign” targeting foreigners and civil society. Prime minister Viktor Orban’s latest publicly funded questionnaire,
dubbed a “national consultation”, asks Hungarians for their views on
what he claims is the Budapest-born Mr. Soros’ ambition to bring at least
one million immigrants to Europe annually from the Middle East and Africa. The government says the European Union
wants to implement this “Soros plan” which, among other things,
allegedly aims to dismantle Hungary’s anti-migrant border fences, impose
“lighter sentences for crimes that (immigrants) commit” and “diminish
the importance of the language and culture of European countries in
order to make the integration of illegal immigrants happen sooner.”
It seems to me, that Mr. Orban has read up on the Frankfurt school and other associated "think tanks". At the very least he alludes to the fact, that the Jews or a Jew, is responsible for this in his targeting of Soros.
It seems to me, that Mr. Orban has read up on the Frankfurt school and other associated "think tanks". At the very least he alludes to the fact, that the Jews or a Jew, is responsible for this in his targeting of Soros.
New York-based Human Rights Watch
said “Hungary’s new official hate campaign” was “likely to fuel
anti-foreigner sentiment” and included questions that were “downright
incendiary and false”.
The group, which is partly
funded by Mr Soros’ foundation, said the government sought to distract
attention from widespread criticism “over its attacks on human rights
and the rule of law” and from “pressing domestic issues, including
challenges facing the education and health care systems.”
Surprise, surprise.... also, it invariably reverts to antisemitism. I'm sure poor Mr. Soros has done nothing to incur the wrath of national governments, other than be a Jew. The age old story of Jews incurring hatred simply for existing. What a tragedy.
Anti-Semitism
Since taking office in 2010, Mr
Orban has concentrated power in his own hands and those of close allies
in politics, business and the media, while dismissing EU concerns as the
meddling of overbearing foreign bureaucrats.
Citing Russia, China and Turkey
as successful examples of the kind of “illiberal” state that he wants
to build in Hungary, Mr Orban has led opposition in central Europe to
plans to resettle refugees around the EU, and allied with the populist
government in Warsaw to resist EU criticism over how Hungary and Poland are run.
Previous national consultations
asked Hungarians what they thought of refugees – which Mr Orban calls a
threat to Europe’s security, culture and identity – and the EU, in a
questionnaire entitled “Let’s stop Brussels!”
Earlier this year, thousands of
government-funded posters appeared around Hungary showing a grinning Mr
Soros (87) beside a caption saying that 99 per cent of Hungarians oppose
illegal immigration and the caption: “Don’t let Soros have the last
laugh!”
Some billboards were defaced
with the words “stinking Jew” and other graffiti, and Mr Soros – a
Holocaust survivor – was among those who accused Hungary’s government of
stoking anti-Semitism.
Mr Orban has also introduced
laws tightening control over foreign-funded NGOs and education reform,
which could force the Soros-funded Central Europe University in Budapest to close.
Pity the man has sons, because even after he dies, they are likely to carry on his liberal nation wrecking agenda.
The Far-right view of "Peace"
By the_g0yim_know on reddit: /r/europeannationalism:
One of the major areas of confusion (which our enemies constantly work at distorting even further) is the Far-Right view of "peace."
First off, what is peace? If you asked someone today, chances are they would start describing pacifism. . . i.e. confrontation avoidance. This is what the average Western person has come to equate with the highest moral standard. It's also one of the primary reasons for the fanatic hatred of who we are and what we stand for: because the Far-Right and only the Far-Right openly opposes this flawed idea of "pacifism" which is based on lies and distortions.
When we speak of "Struggle" we're referring to a major centerpiece of the Fascist & National Socialist worldviews, i.e. the acknowledgement of the fact that life is a constant fight for survival and prosperity! And that's not something we just woke up one day and decided, as our enemies would have you believe. It's an aspect of Natural Law that we've come to understand. The individual, family, race, Nation, et. al which does not fight for itself will decline until it eventually ceases to exist. There's simply no getting around that harsh reality, which is why all Far-Right thought centers around that basic truth.
What then, does the Far-Right view as "peace?"
When we talk of peace, we're referring to something that goes beyond the material world and exists in the spiritual, eternal realm. And this is precisely what trips most people up, particularly in a society which has "modernized" in a way which champions rationalism, atheism, and the appearance of "intellectualism" at the expense of anything which doesn't exist in the material world - of that which holds real, lasting value.
Whereas the values which drive a Fascist/NS have deep-rooted, eternal meaning. But you can only know what you think, and these ideas - ideas which hold a spiritual component - are mocked, distorted, and written off by virtually everyone but us. It's like talking about something that's behind a wall. We know what's there, despite our inability to see it. Whether it's an ideal, Truth, or the existence of an Almighty Creator...these are all singular concepts (which by their very nature are "extreme," since there can only be one) that we KNOW exist by means which go beyond the intellect. We can perceive it with the SOUL. It gives us purpose because it's the very essence of what makes us human.
Fascists and National Socialists champion these very ideals which appeal to our higher nature. Thus, we're fanatic idealists who set out to fight for that which is immaterial and can only be perceived by the soul. In other words, we fight because we've made the profound realization that the ideal is what our soul really wants. It's what nourishes the human spirit and brings out the best in us. And that's precisely why every man who lacks real faith and conviction can never understand the loyalty, selfless service, sacrifice and duty to that which is greater than ourselves that is championed by all "true believers" of our cause.
A common misconception is that our aims start and end with the creation of a White ethnostate. But that's simply just a piece of the pie (albeit an important short-term objective). But our ultimate purpose is to deny the forces of decay, involution, and degneracy – and in that denial to restore all the positive aspects of the human condition.
When you boil it down, the Fascist/NS Struggle is nothing short of a spiritual Crusade against the forces of ruin which seek only "nothingness, nothingness without end" and thus threaten to bring about the downfall of mankind, starting with the European race. Whether you're religious or not, it's irrelevant. If you're in our corner you're fighting for something spiritual - something that's bigger than ourselves and requires our absolute loyalty and devotion to the higher ideals of Truth, justice, and honor.
Thus, being a part of the Far-Right is not about claiming that "I believe" but to take the oath that "I Fight." It means demanding from oneself the integrity and strength to make the necessary sacrifices for that which we know in our hearts is good and true in this world. And we do all this because of what "peace" truly means to us. We know we must act on Faith if we are to rise up and fight for that which is virtuous, in the face of the worst sorts of injustices, at the hands of an enemy which intends to ruin our nations by robbing our white children of the means to be happy, prosperous - and ultimately, to exist on the very lands which belong to them by birthright and the will of God.
To refuse to fight is not "peace," it is the acceptance of our own people's downfall, destruction and despair. Peace is the prevailing of Truth. And that can only result from a hard-earned Victory which must be FOUGHT for, just as Jesus did with the Cross, and just as Hitler did with the Swastika.
One of the major areas of confusion (which our enemies constantly work at distorting even further) is the Far-Right view of "peace."
First off, what is peace? If you asked someone today, chances are they would start describing pacifism. . . i.e. confrontation avoidance. This is what the average Western person has come to equate with the highest moral standard. It's also one of the primary reasons for the fanatic hatred of who we are and what we stand for: because the Far-Right and only the Far-Right openly opposes this flawed idea of "pacifism" which is based on lies and distortions.
When we speak of "Struggle" we're referring to a major centerpiece of the Fascist & National Socialist worldviews, i.e. the acknowledgement of the fact that life is a constant fight for survival and prosperity! And that's not something we just woke up one day and decided, as our enemies would have you believe. It's an aspect of Natural Law that we've come to understand. The individual, family, race, Nation, et. al which does not fight for itself will decline until it eventually ceases to exist. There's simply no getting around that harsh reality, which is why all Far-Right thought centers around that basic truth.
There is but one vocation and it lies only in combat. Hoist the banner of courage, sacrifices, and devotion and watch who gathers round that banner. He who is attracted by the banner is called upon to lead a Nation, and nobody else.– Adolf Hitler at the rollcall of Political Leaders during the Partyday of Freedom (September 14th, 1935)
We fight against everyone. That, is Fascism.– Pierre Drieu La Rochelle, Fascist Socialism
What then, does the Far-Right view as "peace?"
When we talk of peace, we're referring to something that goes beyond the material world and exists in the spiritual, eternal realm. And this is precisely what trips most people up, particularly in a society which has "modernized" in a way which champions rationalism, atheism, and the appearance of "intellectualism" at the expense of anything which doesn't exist in the material world - of that which holds real, lasting value.
Whereas the values which drive a Fascist/NS have deep-rooted, eternal meaning. But you can only know what you think, and these ideas - ideas which hold a spiritual component - are mocked, distorted, and written off by virtually everyone but us. It's like talking about something that's behind a wall. We know what's there, despite our inability to see it. Whether it's an ideal, Truth, or the existence of an Almighty Creator...these are all singular concepts (which by their very nature are "extreme," since there can only be one) that we KNOW exist by means which go beyond the intellect. We can perceive it with the SOUL. It gives us purpose because it's the very essence of what makes us human.
Fascists and National Socialists champion these very ideals which appeal to our higher nature. Thus, we're fanatic idealists who set out to fight for that which is immaterial and can only be perceived by the soul. In other words, we fight because we've made the profound realization that the ideal is what our soul really wants. It's what nourishes the human spirit and brings out the best in us. And that's precisely why every man who lacks real faith and conviction can never understand the loyalty, selfless service, sacrifice and duty to that which is greater than ourselves that is championed by all "true believers" of our cause.
Fascism promises neither glory nor titles nor gain – only duty and struggle.– Benito Mussolini
What exists exists because of loyalty. If that which exists ceases to be loyal, it returns to nothingness. That tears the bonds that hold everything together, it shatters camaraderie; it shatters leadership; it shatters honor; it shatters confidence in the law; it shatters the army; it shatters the state; it shatters everything that exists.– Helmut Stellrecht, Faith and Action
The purpose of life is not that of being more or less happy, but to make oneself and others better, and to combat injustice and error is not a right, but a duty.– Italo Balbo
A common misconception is that our aims start and end with the creation of a White ethnostate. But that's simply just a piece of the pie (albeit an important short-term objective). But our ultimate purpose is to deny the forces of decay, involution, and degneracy – and in that denial to restore all the positive aspects of the human condition.
When you boil it down, the Fascist/NS Struggle is nothing short of a spiritual Crusade against the forces of ruin which seek only "nothingness, nothingness without end" and thus threaten to bring about the downfall of mankind, starting with the European race. Whether you're religious or not, it's irrelevant. If you're in our corner you're fighting for something spiritual - something that's bigger than ourselves and requires our absolute loyalty and devotion to the higher ideals of Truth, justice, and honor.
National Socialism, as a PHILOSOPHY, embodies the eternal urge found in all living things – indeed in all creation – toward a higher level of existence – toward perfection – toward God.– George Lincoln Rockwell
The moment the plan’s creator attempts to consider so-called “convenience” and “reality” instead of absolute truth, his work will no longer be a star seeking humanity and will become nothing more than an everyday procedure.– Adolf Hitler
It may be that money has become the sole power which governs life today, yet a time will come when men will again bow to higher gods.
Thus, being a part of the Far-Right is not about claiming that "I believe" but to take the oath that "I Fight." It means demanding from oneself the integrity and strength to make the necessary sacrifices for that which we know in our hearts is good and true in this world. And we do all this because of what "peace" truly means to us. We know we must act on Faith if we are to rise up and fight for that which is virtuous, in the face of the worst sorts of injustices, at the hands of an enemy which intends to ruin our nations by robbing our white children of the means to be happy, prosperous - and ultimately, to exist on the very lands which belong to them by birthright and the will of God.
To refuse to fight is not "peace," it is the acceptance of our own people's downfall, destruction and despair. Peace is the prevailing of Truth. And that can only result from a hard-earned Victory which must be FOUGHT for, just as Jesus did with the Cross, and just as Hitler did with the Swastika.
It is not the half-hearted and neutral who go down in history, but those who take on the fight.– Adolf Hitler
Friday, 29 September 2017
A Question I Find Odious
This isn't an attack on this particular person, just the question. The question of whether whites should have their own nations is one I find quite repulsive. To me, it's a question that seems to suggest that there is validity to the claims that white people, or better phrased, European people, are a non entity. A people with no ties that bind them together, much as the leftists and globalist progressive types make out.
It's arguing a point from a position of weakness. The assumption should always remain that European nations are our nations, because they are. When these nations were founded, they were not asking themselves how they can help the rest of the planet integrate into English, German, Spanish, Italian society.... they were bringing about the manifestation of the greater family of which their immediate family comprises. They were setting the boundaries of the territorial ownership of their kin, bordering the next ethnic group and remaining separate entities. If you're reading this blog and know my general outlook, I can stop here. I don't think I need to explain the concept of nation, to you. A simple dictionary definition of the word nation will refute globalist no-border advocates.
It really pisses me off, if you couldn't tell. So to stop all these inane fucking questions. YES, whites should could and DO have our own nations. The problem is that they are being invaded. The claims of ownership were never in question. Ireland is Irish. England is English. Scotland is Scottish.
Need I continue?
Thursday, 28 September 2017
Pornography: A weapon of the Jew
You often hear people telling others not to watch porn in these traditionalist nationalist circles, and with good reason, I might add. Yet, they rarely ever explain why you should not watch it as it would require the provision of proof and science to the ever questioning prole afraid of losing something they cherish so dearly, such as their cummies.
Yes, we've all watched porn. We've all 'exhausted' ourselves in front of the altar of Jewish smut. None of us ever truly thinking deeply on what it is we are actually doing besides "relieving" ourselves. Well, you might not be aware but the consumption of porn actually changes the physiology of your brain. Yes, it re-wires how you think, at least in the specific category of sex and sexual endeavours.
Nothing I write here is original on my part. This is all established science and peer-reviewed studies of porn users. All taken from: https://yourbrainonporn.com/. If you're one of the people who still does not believe that porn has any lasting negative effects then I encourage you to read that website, read the articles and studies, watch the videos, and think on it. Take it in. Think about the ways you might actually be affected by it personally, because I can almost guarantee you, that you are affected. Everything you watch, read, especially without thinking has an affect on you, whether positive or negative.
"Reality Check - Regardless of what you may read in some journalistic accounts, multiple studies reveal a link between porn use and sexual performance problems, relationship and sexual dissatisfaction, and reduced brain activation to sexual stimuli.
Yes, we've all watched porn. We've all 'exhausted' ourselves in front of the altar of Jewish smut. None of us ever truly thinking deeply on what it is we are actually doing besides "relieving" ourselves. Well, you might not be aware but the consumption of porn actually changes the physiology of your brain. Yes, it re-wires how you think, at least in the specific category of sex and sexual endeavours.
Nothing I write here is original on my part. This is all established science and peer-reviewed studies of porn users. All taken from: https://yourbrainonporn.com/. If you're one of the people who still does not believe that porn has any lasting negative effects then I encourage you to read that website, read the articles and studies, watch the videos, and think on it. Take it in. Think about the ways you might actually be affected by it personally, because I can almost guarantee you, that you are affected. Everything you watch, read, especially without thinking has an affect on you, whether positive or negative.
"Reality Check - Regardless of what you may read in some journalistic accounts, multiple studies reveal a link between porn use and sexual performance problems, relationship and sexual dissatisfaction, and reduced brain activation to sexual stimuli.
Let's start with sexual dysfunctions. Studies assessing young male
sexuality since 2010 report historic levels of sexual dysfunctions, and
startling rates of a new scourge: low libido. Documented in this lay article and in this peer-reviewed paper involving 7 US Navy doctors - Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports (2016)"
It affects you in the ways as mentioned in the paragraph I pasted in from the website. It actually changes how you react to sexual stimuli and it affects your sexual performance. That is where this ties into the point of this post. The fact of pornography being a weapon of the Jewish globalists. It's a psychological weapon. A Biological weapon even, if you count the way it actually changes your brain functions.
If you can't perform with a flesh and blood partner, how long will that relationship last? How long before your woman becomes unsatisfied and seeks gratification elsewhere? This is the weapon. The separation of white men and women through sexual dissatisfaction and the glorification of foreigners as masters of sexual prowess. I mean, when it actually reduces your brain activation to sexual stimuli, you know it's bad for you.
Instead of watching porn, use that energy to make yourself more appealing to the opposite sex. It will be energy much more productively spent, it will actually improve your life and bring your brain back to it's natural functioning. Of course, depending on the frequency and length of time you've been consuming porn, the longer it will take. You don't have to stop bashing one out every now and then, but you can do that without porn! Haha! If I still haven't convinced you, take a look at the benefits people experience when they give it up:
"Many individuals who cease using porn for an extended period of time report mental and cognitive benefits, such as improved concentration and focus, better grades, increased energy and motivation, social anxiety improved or gone, increased confidence, improved mood, depression reduced or gone, greater desire to be social, more intense or vibrant emotions, and increased desire to be in a loving relationship."
It affects you in the ways as mentioned in the paragraph I pasted in from the website. It actually changes how you react to sexual stimuli and it affects your sexual performance. That is where this ties into the point of this post. The fact of pornography being a weapon of the Jewish globalists. It's a psychological weapon. A Biological weapon even, if you count the way it actually changes your brain functions.
If you can't perform with a flesh and blood partner, how long will that relationship last? How long before your woman becomes unsatisfied and seeks gratification elsewhere? This is the weapon. The separation of white men and women through sexual dissatisfaction and the glorification of foreigners as masters of sexual prowess. I mean, when it actually reduces your brain activation to sexual stimuli, you know it's bad for you.
Instead of watching porn, use that energy to make yourself more appealing to the opposite sex. It will be energy much more productively spent, it will actually improve your life and bring your brain back to it's natural functioning. Of course, depending on the frequency and length of time you've been consuming porn, the longer it will take. You don't have to stop bashing one out every now and then, but you can do that without porn! Haha! If I still haven't convinced you, take a look at the benefits people experience when they give it up:
"Many individuals who cease using porn for an extended period of time report mental and cognitive benefits, such as improved concentration and focus, better grades, increased energy and motivation, social anxiety improved or gone, increased confidence, improved mood, depression reduced or gone, greater desire to be social, more intense or vibrant emotions, and increased desire to be in a loving relationship."
Ireland is not untouched by terrorism.
We may not have had an attack on Irish soil yet, but Ireland is used to aid in the logistics of Islamic State, according to an Independent article: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/is-members-use-student-mules-at-irish-colleges-to-finance-operations-36164976.html
"Islamist extremists are using unsuspecting students in Irish third level colleges to transfer the proceeds of internet fraud to finance Islamic State terrorist operations.
"Islamist extremists are using unsuspecting students in Irish third level colleges to transfer the proceeds of internet fraud to finance Islamic State terrorist operations.
The unwitting, mostly foreign, students are duped into opening
personal accounts in Irish banks by secret IS sympathisers who are
members of a back-up network providing logistical support in the form of
cash and false travel documents to terrorists in Britain and Europe."
They are using Ireland for this purpose, but it's not all just theft that interests them in Ireland. Some of them were actively planning an attack that was to take place in Ireland, but they were stopped by their terrorist leader:
"Khuram Shazad Butt (27) and Rachid Redouane (31), who with a third accomplice were shot dead by UK police following the attack, had reconnoitered a number of high-profile locations in Dublin they identified as potential targets.
They are using Ireland for this purpose, but it's not all just theft that interests them in Ireland. Some of them were actively planning an attack that was to take place in Ireland, but they were stopped by their terrorist leader:
"Khuram Shazad Butt (27) and Rachid Redouane (31), who with a third accomplice were shot dead by UK police following the attack, had reconnoitered a number of high-profile locations in Dublin they identified as potential targets.
However, Butt and Redouane, who was married to an Irishwoman and
lived in Dublin for a number of years, were told by their terrorist
mentor, named 'Raza', that such an attack would be counter-productive
because Ireland was better suited as a logistics and fundraising base."
This shows their intentions towards Ireland. To use it as 'Raza' said "Ireland was better suited as a logistics and fundraising base." However, his younger cohorts are not so 'forward thinking' as their mentor, and it's possibly only a matter of time before some of the more primitively minded younger terrorists do in fact take violent action in Ireland.
Ireland must ask itself some serious questions if it is to come off better in regards to terrorism than Europe and the rest of the world. Otherwise, we are simply following their example and following their path into decades of terrorism and racial/religious/ethnic conflict. Something the likes of which Ireland has never seen before. It will make the troubles pale in comparison.
This shows their intentions towards Ireland. To use it as 'Raza' said "Ireland was better suited as a logistics and fundraising base." However, his younger cohorts are not so 'forward thinking' as their mentor, and it's possibly only a matter of time before some of the more primitively minded younger terrorists do in fact take violent action in Ireland.
Ireland must ask itself some serious questions if it is to come off better in regards to terrorism than Europe and the rest of the world. Otherwise, we are simply following their example and following their path into decades of terrorism and racial/religious/ethnic conflict. Something the likes of which Ireland has never seen before. It will make the troubles pale in comparison.